医学
心肺复苏术
复苏
医疗急救
质量管理
重症监护医学
质量(理念)
急诊医学
运营管理
管理制度
认识论
哲学
经济
作者
Peter A. Meaney,Bentley J. Bobrow,Mary E. Mancini,Jim Christenson,Allan R. de Caen,Farhan Bhanji,Benjamin S. Abella,Monica E. Kleinman,Dana P. Edelson,Robert A. Berg,Tom P. Aufderheide,Venu Menon,Marion Leary
出处
期刊:Circulation
[Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
日期:2013-06-26
卷期号:128 (4): 417-435
被引量:931
标识
DOI:10.1161/cir.0b013e31829d8654
摘要
The "2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care" increased the focus on methods to ensure that high-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is performed in all resuscitation attempts. There are 5 critical components of high-quality CPR: minimize interruptions in chest compressions, provide compressions of adequate rate and depth, avoid leaning between compressions, and avoid excessive ventilation. Although it is clear that high-quality CPR is the primary component in influencing survival from cardiac arrest, there is considerable variation in monitoring, implementation, and quality improvement. As such, CPR quality varies widely between systems and locations. Victims often do not receive high-quality CPR because of provider ambiguity in prioritization of resuscitative efforts during an arrest. This ambiguity also impedes the development of optimal systems of care to increase survival from cardiac arrest. This consensus statement addresses the following key areas of CPR quality for the trained rescuer: metrics of CPR performance; monitoring, feedback, and integration of the patient’s response to CPR; team-level logistics to ensure performance of high-quality CPR; and continuous quality improvement on provider, team, and systems levels. Clear definitions of metrics and methods to consistently deliver and improve the quality of CPR will narrow the gap between resuscitation science and the victims, both in and out of the hospital, and lay the foundation for further improvements in the future.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI