Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality: Improving Cardiac Resuscitation Outcomes Both Inside and Outside the Hospital

医学 心肺复苏术 复苏 医疗急救 质量管理 重症监护医学 质量(理念) 急诊医学 运营管理 管理制度 认识论 哲学 经济
作者
Peter A. Meaney,Bentley J. Bobrow,Mary E. Mancini,Jim Christenson,Allan R. de Caen,Farhan Bhanji,Benjamin S. Abella,Monica E. Kleinman,Dana P. Edelson,Robert A. Berg,Tom P. Aufderheide,Venu Menon,Marion Leary
出处
期刊:Circulation [Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
卷期号:128 (4): 417-435 被引量:931
标识
DOI:10.1161/cir.0b013e31829d8654
摘要

The "2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care" increased the focus on methods to ensure that high-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is performed in all resuscitation attempts. There are 5 critical components of high-quality CPR: minimize interruptions in chest compressions, provide compressions of adequate rate and depth, avoid leaning between compressions, and avoid excessive ventilation. Although it is clear that high-quality CPR is the primary component in influencing survival from cardiac arrest, there is considerable variation in monitoring, implementation, and quality improvement. As such, CPR quality varies widely between systems and locations. Victims often do not receive high-quality CPR because of provider ambiguity in prioritization of resuscitative efforts during an arrest. This ambiguity also impedes the development of optimal systems of care to increase survival from cardiac arrest. This consensus statement addresses the following key areas of CPR quality for the trained rescuer: metrics of CPR performance; monitoring, feedback, and integration of the patient’s response to CPR; team-level logistics to ensure performance of high-quality CPR; and continuous quality improvement on provider, team, and systems levels. Clear definitions of metrics and methods to consistently deliver and improve the quality of CPR will narrow the gap between resuscitation science and the victims, both in and out of the hospital, and lay the foundation for further improvements in the future.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
一二发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
15275785982完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
马喽吃糖发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
4秒前
Nick_YFWS完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
深情安青应助桃桃宝采纳,获得10
7秒前
菜菜子完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
研究僧完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
天天快乐应助adding采纳,获得10
8秒前
6666发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
ZZZ完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
11秒前
情怀应助minghanl采纳,获得10
11秒前
一二完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
翟小灰完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
14秒前
科研狗发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
汉堡包应助一二采纳,获得10
16秒前
16秒前
Augenstern完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
19秒前
小小发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
40780完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
19秒前
小糊涂发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
自信半雪完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
20秒前
独指蜗牛发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
zzzzz完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
21秒前
桃桃宝发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
minghanl完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
才疏学浅完成签到 ,获得积分10
24秒前
legoman发布了新的文献求助10
24秒前
minghanl发布了新的文献求助10
24秒前
25秒前
香蕉觅云应助伏玉采纳,获得10
25秒前
小蘑菇应助fjmelite采纳,获得10
26秒前
26秒前
memebao完成签到,获得积分10
27秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
The Cambridge History of China: Volume 4, Sui and T'ang China, 589–906 AD, Part Two 1500
Cowries - A Guide to the Gastropod Family Cypraeidae 1200
Quality by Design - An Indispensable Approach to Accelerate Biopharmaceutical Product Development 800
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
Research Methods for Applied Linguistics 500
A Social and Cultural History of the Hellenistic World 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6395863
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8211195
关于积分的说明 17392388
捐赠科研通 5449242
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2880434
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1857048
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1699413