核磁共振
核医学
磁共振成像
物理
化学
医学
放射科
作者
Spencer Waddle,Maria Garza,Chunwei Ying,L. Taylor Davis,Lori C. Jordan,Hongyu An,Manus J. Donahue
摘要
Purpose Asymmetric spin echo (ASE) MRI is a method for measuring regional oxygen extraction fraction (OEF); however, extravascular tissue models have been shown to under‐estimate OEF. The hypothesis investigated here is that the addition of a vascular‐space‐occupancy (VASO) pre‐pulse will more fully suppress blood water signal and provide global OEF values more consistent with physiological expectation and 15 O positron emission tomography (PET)‐validated T 2 ‐relaxation‐under‐spin‐tagging (TRUST) OEF measures. Methods Healthy adults ( n = 14; age = 27.7 ± 5.2 y; sex = 7/7 male/female) were scanned at 3.0T. Multi‐echo ASE without inter‐readout refocusing (ASE RF− ), multi‐echo ASE with inter‐readout refocusing (ASE RF+ ), and single‐echo VASO‐ASE were acquired twice each with common spatial resolution = 3.44 × 3.44 × 3.0 mm and τ = 0–20 ms (interval = 0.5 ms). TRUST was acquired twice sequentially for independent global OEF assessment ( τ CPMG = 10 ms; effective TEs = 0, 40, 80, and 160 ms; spatial resolution = 3.4 × 3.4 × 5 mm). OEF intraclass‐correlation‐coefficients (ICC), summary statistics, and group‐wise differences were assessed (Wilcoxon rank‐sum; significance: two‐sided p < 0.05). Results ASE RF+ (OEF = 36.8 ± 1.9%) and VASO‐ASE (OEF = 34.4 ± 2.3%) produced OEF values similar to TRUST (OEF = 36.5 ± 4.6%, human calibration model; OEF = 32.7 ± 4.9%, bovine calibration model); however, ASE RF− yielded lower OEF (OEF = 26.1 ± 1.0%; p < 0.01) relative to TRUST. VASO‐ASE (ICC = 0.61) yielded lower ICC compared to other ASE variants (ICC >0.89). Conclusion VASO‐ASE and TRUST provide similar OEF values; however, VASO‐ASE spatial coverage and repeatability improvements are required.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI