协变量
稳健性(进化)
计算机科学
样本量测定
先验概率
贝叶斯概率
贝叶斯定理
基线(sea)
数据挖掘
统计
机器学习
计量经济学
随机对照试验
临床试验
等价(形式语言)
桥接(联网)
人工智能
贝叶斯推理
估计员
取样偏差
倾向得分匹配
事先信息
离群值
I类和II类错误
平均处理效果
作者
Keer Chen,Zengyue Zheng,Weihao Li,Shuping Jiang,Nan Li,Jumin Deng,Pingyan Chen,Zhenyu Wu,Ying Wu
标识
DOI:10.1177/09622802251414586
摘要
Background Hybrid clinical trial design integrates traditional randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with real-world data (RWD), aiming to enhance trial efficiency through dynamic incorporation of external data (External trial data and RWD). However, existing methods, such as the Meta-Analytic Predictive (MAP) Prior, exhibit serious limitations in controlling data heterogeneity, adjusting baseline discrepancies, and optimizing dynamic borrowing proportions. These limitations often introduce external bias or compromise evidence reliability, hindering their application in complex analyses like bridging trials and multi-regional clinical trials (MRCTs). Objective This study proposes a novel hybrid Bayesian framework, EQPS Robust MAP (rMAP), to address heterogeneity and bias in multi-source data integration. Its feasibility and robustness are validated through systematic simulations and retrospective case analyses, using two independent datasets to evaluate the effect of Risankizumab in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Design and Methods The EQPS-rMAP method operates in three stages: (1) Eliminating baseline covariate discrepancies through propensity score stratification; (2) constructing stratum-specific MAP priors to dynamically adjust weights for external data; and (3) introducing equivalence probability weights to quantify data conflict risks. The study evaluates the method's performance across six simulated analyses (heterogeneity differences, baseline shifts, etc.), comparing it with traditional methods (MAP, PSMAP, Empirical Bayes MAP) in terms of estimation bias, type I error control, and sample size requirements. Real-world case analyses further validate its applicability. Results Simulations demonstrate that EQPS-rMAP maintains estimation robustness under considerable heterogeneity while reducing sample size demands and enhancing trial efficiency. Case analyses confirm its ability to control external bias while preserving high estimation accuracy compared to conventional approaches. Conclusion The EQPS-rMAP method provides empirical evidence for the feasibility of hybrid clinical designs. Its methodological advancements—resolving baseline and heterogeneity conflicts through adaptive mechanisms—offer broader applicability for integrating external and RWD across diverse analyses, including bridging trials, MRCTs, and post-marketing studies.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI