医学
肝细胞癌
倾向得分匹配
内科学
毒性
总体生存率
回顾性队列研究
多元分析
经导管动脉化疗栓塞
放射科
肿瘤科
作者
Tiffany Wong,Chi‐Leung Chiang,Ann‐Shing Lee,Victor Lee,Cynthia Yeung,Connie H. M. Ho,Tan To Cheung,Kelvin K. Ng,Ksh Chok,Albert Chan,W.C. Dai,Frank CS Wong,Mai‐Yee Luk,To‐Wai Leung,Chung‐Mau Lo
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.suronc.2019.01.006
摘要
This study compared outcomes of nonresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who had transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) vs. stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) after TACE (TACE + SBRT).This was a retrospective study of 2 centers in Hong Kong. There were 49 patients who had TACE + SBRT and 202 patients who had TACE alone. Propensity score matching was used to adjust for differences in patients' demographics and tumor characteristics between the 2 groups. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) and secondary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and treatment-related toxicity.After matching, 49 patients were in the TACE + SBRT group and 98 patients in the TACE group with similar baseline characteristics. The 1-&3-year OS were better in TACE + SBRT group (67.2 vs. 43.9% and 36.5 vs. 13.3%, p = 0.003). The 1-&3-year PFS was also better in TACE + SBRT group (32.5 vs. 21.4% and 15.1 vs. 5.1%, p = 0.012). Radiological disease control was better in the TACE + SBRT group (98 vs. 56.7%). Risk of severe toxicity was uncommon in both treatment arms. TACE + SBRT was an independent good prognostic factor for OS and PFS in multivariate analysis, whereas AFP>200 ng/ml, large tumor and multiple tumors predicted worse OS.TACE + SBRT is safe and results in better survivals in nonresectable HCC patients.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI