REporting recommendations for tumor MARKer prognostic studies (REMARK)

肿瘤科 内科学 精确肿瘤学 临床试验 癌症
作者
Lisa M. McShane,Douglas G. Altman,Willi Sauerbrei,Sheila E Taube,Massimo Gion,Gary M. Clark
出处
期刊:Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology [Nature Portfolio]
卷期号:2 (8): 416-422 被引量:89
标识
DOI:10.1038/ncponc0252
摘要

Despite years of research and hundreds of reports on tumor markers in oncology, the number of markers that have emerged as clinically useful is pitifully small. Often initially reported studies of a marker show great promise, but subsequent studies on the same or related markers yield inconsistent conclusions or stand in direct contradiction to the promising results. It is imperative that we attempt to understand the reasons why multiple studies of the same marker lead to differing conclusions. A variety of methodological problems have been cited to explain these discrepancies. Unfortunately, many tumor marker studies have not been reported in a rigorous fashion, and published articles often lack sufficient information to allow adequate assessment of the quality of the study or the generalizability of study results. The development of guidelines for the reporting of tumor marker studies was a major recommendation of the National Cancer Institute-European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (NCI-EORTC) First International Meeting on Cancer Diagnostics in 2000. As for the successful CONSORT initiative for randomized trials and for the STARD statement for diagnostic studies, we suggest guidelines to provide relevant information about the study design, preplanned hypotheses, patient and specimen characteristics, assay methods, and statistical analysis methods. In addition, the guidelines provide helpful suggestions on how to present data and important elements to include in discussions. The goal of these guidelines is to encourage transparent and complete reporting so that the relevant information will be available to others to help them to judge the usefulness of the data and understand the context in which the conclusions apply.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
5秒前
PSL发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
6秒前
npknpk发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
9秒前
11秒前
11秒前
善良荧荧发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
14秒前
娜写年华发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
木光完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
15秒前
车 干完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
SciGPT应助npknpk采纳,获得10
18秒前
啦啦啦完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
研友_Lw4Ngn发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
终于开始完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
GealAntS完成签到,获得积分0
20秒前
Ava应助lvlv采纳,获得20
20秒前
烟花应助xu采纳,获得10
20秒前
jjy完成签到 ,获得积分10
21秒前
22秒前
23秒前
ks关闭了ks文献求助
23秒前
24秒前
无花果应助千帆破浪采纳,获得10
24秒前
25秒前
jiafx发布了新的文献求助10
27秒前
jacob258完成签到 ,获得积分10
27秒前
28秒前
樱铃完成签到,获得积分10
29秒前
猪猪hero应助cindy采纳,获得10
30秒前
oxygen发布了新的文献求助10
30秒前
30秒前
林sir发布了新的文献求助10
31秒前
LBF发布了新的文献求助10
33秒前
34秒前
34秒前
高分求助中
A new approach to the extrapolation of accelerated life test data 1000
‘Unruly’ Children: Historical Fieldnotes and Learning Morality in a Taiwan Village (New Departures in Anthropology) 400
Indomethacinのヒトにおける経皮吸収 400
Phylogenetic study of the order Polydesmida (Myriapoda: Diplopoda) 370
基于可调谐半导体激光吸收光谱技术泄漏气体检测系统的研究 330
Composite Predicates in English 300
Aktuelle Entwicklungen in der linguistischen Forschung 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3984041
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3527406
关于积分的说明 11236431
捐赠科研通 3265657
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1802674
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 880606
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 808199