REporting recommendations for tumor MARKer prognostic studies (REMARK)

肿瘤科 内科学 精确肿瘤学 临床试验 癌症
作者
Lisa M. McShane,Douglas G. Altman,Willi Sauerbrei,Sheila E Taube,Massimo Gion,Gary M. Clark
出处
期刊:Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology [Nature Portfolio]
卷期号:2 (8): 416-422 被引量:89
标识
DOI:10.1038/ncponc0252
摘要

Despite years of research and hundreds of reports on tumor markers in oncology, the number of markers that have emerged as clinically useful is pitifully small. Often initially reported studies of a marker show great promise, but subsequent studies on the same or related markers yield inconsistent conclusions or stand in direct contradiction to the promising results. It is imperative that we attempt to understand the reasons why multiple studies of the same marker lead to differing conclusions. A variety of methodological problems have been cited to explain these discrepancies. Unfortunately, many tumor marker studies have not been reported in a rigorous fashion, and published articles often lack sufficient information to allow adequate assessment of the quality of the study or the generalizability of study results. The development of guidelines for the reporting of tumor marker studies was a major recommendation of the National Cancer Institute-European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (NCI-EORTC) First International Meeting on Cancer Diagnostics in 2000. As for the successful CONSORT initiative for randomized trials and for the STARD statement for diagnostic studies, we suggest guidelines to provide relevant information about the study design, preplanned hypotheses, patient and specimen characteristics, assay methods, and statistical analysis methods. In addition, the guidelines provide helpful suggestions on how to present data and important elements to include in discussions. The goal of these guidelines is to encourage transparent and complete reporting so that the relevant information will be available to others to help them to judge the usefulness of the data and understand the context in which the conclusions apply.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
任性的稀发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
刚刚
刚刚
帅气白梦完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
玲月发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
dongjy应助一区常驻小仙女采纳,获得20
1秒前
雪见发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
ccchao发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
没有稗子完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
3秒前
狗东西发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
开心的饼干完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
Wcy发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
海东南发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
Xiang Li发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
Orange应助李三三采纳,获得10
7秒前
xch完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
dongjy应助zuijiasunyou采纳,获得20
8秒前
8秒前
我是老大应助无限妙梦采纳,获得10
8秒前
9秒前
小尾巴完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
俭朴的小熊猫完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
10秒前
脑洞疼应助xutaiyu采纳,获得10
10秒前
yyy0820发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
SciGPT应助欧气青年采纳,获得10
10秒前
酷波er应助1234567890采纳,获得10
10秒前
11秒前
深情安青应助ymmmaomao23采纳,获得10
12秒前
12秒前
PaoPao发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
13秒前
13秒前
13秒前
靓丽紫真完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
yxsxm发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
高分求助中
A new approach to the extrapolation of accelerated life test data 1000
‘Unruly’ Children: Historical Fieldnotes and Learning Morality in a Taiwan Village (New Departures in Anthropology) 400
Indomethacinのヒトにおける経皮吸収 400
Phylogenetic study of the order Polydesmida (Myriapoda: Diplopoda) 370
基于可调谐半导体激光吸收光谱技术泄漏气体检测系统的研究 330
Composite Predicates in English 300
Aktuelle Entwicklungen in der linguistischen Forschung 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3983166
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3526687
关于积分的说明 11233161
捐赠科研通 3264959
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1802148
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 880287
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 807927