Multimodality US versus Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System Criteria in Recommending Fine-Needle Aspiration of Thyroid Nodules

医学 甲状腺结节 放射科 回声 细针穿刺 弹性成像 甲状腺 接收机工作特性 逻辑回归 结核(地质) 超声波 核医学 活检 内科学 古生物学 生物
作者
Xiaojun Fan,Jianming Li,Zhiyu Han,Fangyi Liu,Jie Yu,Mingxing Xie,Ping Zhou,Lei Liang,Guangxi Zhou,Ying Che,Shu-Rong Wang,Cun Liu,Zhibin Cong,Ping Liang
出处
期刊:Radiology [Radiological Society of North America]
卷期号:307 (5) 被引量:1
标识
DOI:10.1148/radiol.221408
摘要

Background Current guidelines recommend the use of conventional US for risk stratification and management of thyroid nodules. However, fine-needle aspiration (FNA) is often recommended in benign nodules. Purpose To compare the diagnostic performance of multimodality US (including conventional US, strain elastography, and contrast-enhanced US [CEUS]) with the American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS) in the recommendation of FNA for thyroid nodules to reduce unnecessary biopsies. Materials and Methods In this prospective study, 445 consecutive participants with thyroid nodules from nine tertiary referral hospitals were recruited between October 2020 and May 2021. With univariable and multivariable logistic regression, the prediction models incorporating sonographic features, evaluated with interobserver agreement, were constructed and internally validated with bootstrap resampling technique. In addition, discrimination, calibration, and decision curve analysis were performed. Results A total of 434 thyroid nodules confirmed at pathologic analysis (259 malignant thyroid nodules) in 434 participants (mean age, 45 years ± 12 [SD]; 307 female participants) were included. Four multivariable models incorporated participant age, nodule features at US (proportion of cystic components, echogenicity, margin, shape, punctate echogenic foci), elastography features (stiffness), and CEUS features (blood volume). In recommending FNA in thyroid nodules, the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.85 (95% CI: 0.81, 0.89) for the multimodality US model, and the lowest AUC was 0.63 (95% CI: 0.59, 0.68) for TI-RADS (P < .001). At the 50% risk threshold, 31% (95% CI: 26, 38) of FNA procedures could be avoided with multimodality US compared with 15% (95% CI: 12, 19) with TI-RADS (P < .001). Conclusion Multimodality US had better performance in recommending FNA to avoid unnecessary biopsies than the TI-RADS. Clinical trial registration no. NCT04574258 © RSNA, 2023 Supplemental material is available for this article.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
下下潜发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
wwwteng呀完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
122发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
4秒前
5秒前
pan完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
ttttt发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
long0809发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
香蕉觅云应助122采纳,获得10
9秒前
柚子发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
10秒前
李爱国应助pan采纳,获得10
11秒前
Hello应助柚子采纳,获得10
14秒前
科研小生发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
li33333发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
Kimo完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
平淡路人完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
17秒前
Minzz完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
灯火发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
柯一一应助未命名采纳,获得10
23秒前
Akim应助memem1采纳,获得10
24秒前
25秒前
ttttt完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
一生所爱完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
YY完成签到,获得积分10
30秒前
31秒前
31秒前
莫羽倾尘发布了新的文献求助10
32秒前
DOGDAD应助九品芝麻官采纳,获得10
32秒前
鲨猫收藏家完成签到 ,获得积分10
34秒前
li33333完成签到,获得积分10
34秒前
啊哈完成签到,获得积分10
36秒前
jy发布了新的文献求助10
36秒前
37秒前
隐形曼青应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
41秒前
大模型应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
41秒前
领导范儿应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
41秒前
高分求助中
请在求助之前详细阅读求助说明!!!! 20000
One Man Talking: Selected Essays of Shao Xunmei, 1929–1939 1000
Yuwu Song, Biographical Dictionary of the People's Republic of China 700
[Lambert-Eaton syndrome without calcium channel autoantibodies] 520
Pressing the Fight: Print, Propaganda, and the Cold War 500
Bernd Ziesemer - Maos deutscher Topagent: Wie China die Bundesrepublik eroberte 500
The Three Stars Each: The Astrolabes and Related Texts 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 有机化学 工程类 生物化学 纳米技术 物理 内科学 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 电极 光电子学 量子力学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 2470623
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2137423
关于积分的说明 5446309
捐赠科研通 1861574
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 925783
版权声明 562721
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 495235