医学
心脏病学
内科学
心房颤动
烧蚀
导管消融
肥厚性心肌病
心肌病
心力衰竭
作者
Charles Butcher,Saffron Rajappan,Amy Wharmby,Waqas Ullah,Tom Wong,David G. Jones,Kim Rajappan,Claire Martin,Perry Elliott,Jaspal Singh Gill,Mark Specterman,Mehul Dhinoja,Simon Sporton,Pier D. Lambiase,Ross J. Hunter,Shohreh Honarbakhsh
出处
期刊:Heart Rhythm
[Elsevier BV]
日期:2023-08-24
卷期号:20 (12): 1606-1614
被引量:4
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.hrthm.2023.08.028
摘要
Background
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is common in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and can be challenging to manage. Atrioventricular nodal (AVN) ablation may be an effective management strategy for AF in these patients. Objective
The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of AVN ablation in HCM patients who have failed medical therapy and/or catheter ablation for AF. Methods
A multicenter study with retrospective analysis of a prospectively collated HCM registry was performed. AVN ablation patients were identified. Baseline characteristics and device and procedural indications were collected. Symptoms defined by New York Heart Association and European Heart Rhythm Association classification and echocardiographic findings during follow-up were assessed. Results
Fifty-nine patients were included in the study. Indications for AVN ablation were 6 (10.2%) inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shock, 35 (59.3%) ineffective rate control, and 18 (30.5%) to regularize rhythm for symptom improvement. During post-AVN ablation follow-up of 79.4 ± 61.1 months, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) remained stable (pre-LVEF 48.9% ± 12.6% vs post-LVEF 50.1% ± 10.1%; P = .29), even in those without a cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) device (pre-LVEF 54.3% ± 8.0% vs post-LVEF 53.8% ± 8.0%; P = .65). Forty-nine patients (83.1%) reported an improvement in symptoms regardless of AF type (17/21 [81.0%] paroxysmal vs 32/38 [84.2%] persistent; P = 1.00), presence of baseline left ventricular impairment (22/26 [84.6%] LVEF ≤50% vs 27/33 [81.8%] LVEF ≥50%; P = 1.00) or CRT device (27/32 [84.4%] CRT vs 22/27 [81.5%] no CRT; P = 1.00). Symptoms improved in 16 patients (89.0%) who underwent AVN ablation to regularize rhythm. Conclusion
AVN ablation improved symptoms without impacting left ventricular function in the majority of patients. The data suggest that AVN ablation is an effective and safe management approach for AF in HCM and should be further evaluated in larger prospective studies.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI