医学
荟萃分析
内科学
相对风险
入射(几何)
冲程(发动机)
随机对照试验
心肌梗塞
维生素D与神经学
临床试验
置信区间
机械工程
光学
物理
工程类
作者
Yiyan Pei,Yu Zhang,Xingchen Peng,Zheran Liu,Ping Xu,Fang Fang
出处
期刊:Nutrients
[Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute]
日期:2022-07-30
卷期号:14 (15): 3158-3158
被引量:25
摘要
Background: low vitamin D status has been associated with an increased incidence of cardiovascular events. However, whether vitamin D supplementation would reduce the incidence of cardiovascular events remains unclear. Purpose: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of vitamin D supplementation on the mortality and incidence of cardiovascular events. Data Sources: We searched Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from their inception until 3 May 2022. Study Selection: Two authors searched for randomized clinical trials that reported vitamin D supplementation’s effect on cardiovascular events outcomes. Data Extraction: Two authors conducted independent data extraction. Data Synthesis: We identified 41,809 reports; after exclusions, 18 trials with a total of 70,278 participants were eligible for analysis. Vitamin D supplementation was not associated with the mortality of cardiovascular events (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.88–1.06, I2 = 0%), the incidence of stroke (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.92–1.20, I2 = 0%), myocardial infarction (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.87–1.09, I2 = 0%), total cardiovascular events (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.91–1.04, I2 = 27%), or cerebrovascular events (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.87–1.18, I2 = 0%). Limitation: Cardiovascular events were the secondary outcome in most trials and thus, might be selectively reported. Conclusion: In this meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials, vitamin D supplementation was not associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular events than no supplementation. These findings do not support the routine use of vitamin D supplementation in general.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI