Standards for the Use of Enteral Nutrition in Patients with Diabetes or Stress Hyperglycaemia: Expert Consensus

医学 肠外营养 德尔菲法 重症监护医学 肠内给药 糖尿病 2型糖尿病 梅德林 内分泌学 政治学 数学 统计 法学
作者
María Isabel Rebollo Pérez,Luna Florencio Ojeda,Pedro Pablo García‐Luna,José Antonio Irles Rocamora,Gabriel Olveira,Juan Ramón Lacalle-Remigio,Carmen Arraiza Irigoyen,Alfonso Calañas Continente,Cristina Campos Martín,María Luisa Fernández Soto,José Manuel García‐Almeida,María Laínez López,Concepción Losada Morell,Luis Miguel Luengo Pérez,Teodosia Muñoz de Escalona Martínez,José Luis Pereira Cunill,Francisco Javier Vílchez-López,Juana M. Rabat-Restrepo
出处
期刊:Nutrients [Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute]
卷期号:15 (23): 4976-4976 被引量:10
标识
DOI:10.3390/nu15234976
摘要

(1) Background: Hyperglycaemia that occurs during enteral nutrition (EN) should be prevented and treated appropriately since it can have important consequences for morbidity and mortality. However, there are few quality studies in the literature regarding the management of EN in this situation. The objective of this project was to attempt to respond, through a panel of experts, to those clinical problems regarding EN in patients with diabetes or stress hyperglycaemia (hereinafter referred to only as hyperglycaemia) for which we do not have conclusive scientific evidence; (2) Methods: The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method, a modified Delphi panel method, was applied. A panel of experts made up of 10 clinical nutrition specialists was formed, and they scored on the appropriateness of EN in hyperglycaemia, doing so in two rounds. A total of 2992 clinical scenarios were examined, which were stratified into five chapters: type of formula used, method of administration, infusion site, treatment of diabetes, and gastrointestinal complications. (3) Results: consensus was detected in 36.4% of the clinical scenarios presented, of which 23.7% were deemed appropriate scenarios, while 12.7% were deemed inappropriate. The remaining 63.6% of the scenarios were classified as uncertain; (4) Conclusions: The recommendations extracted will be useful for improving the clinical management of these patients. However, there are still many uncertain scenarios reflecting that the criteria for the management of EN in hyperglycaemia are not completely standardised. More studies are required to provide quality recommendations in this area.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
LC发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
Endorphins完成签到,获得积分20
1秒前
lei完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
2秒前
沈锐完成签到,获得积分20
2秒前
LAN发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
4秒前
wyy完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
隐形曼青的应助被qin采纳,获得10
4秒前
5秒前
yangqiaozhe发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
foggycity完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
YUfangjie发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
hhh完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
慕青的应助被小霖采纳,获得10
6秒前
初霁完成签到,获得积分20
6秒前
尼尼完成签到,获得积分20
7秒前
8秒前
6666发布了新的文献求助30
8秒前
8秒前
8秒前
小周发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
小暴发布了新的文献求助30
9秒前
10秒前
10秒前
沈锐发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
11秒前
李健的小迷弟的应助被leilei采纳,获得10
11秒前
xun完成签到,获得积分20
11秒前
12秒前
molihuakai的应助被嘻嘻采纳,获得10
13秒前
wYyyy发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
13秒前
单纯的不乐完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
熊猫海发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
MM完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
所所的应助被yangqiaozhe采纳,获得10
15秒前
沉静的翼发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
我生气惹完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
17秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Energie-Contracting 1500
Klimaschutzrecht durch den Energiesektor im Mehrebenensystem – Ein Rechtsvergleich 1000
Oncology Clinical Trials: Successful Design, Conduct, and Analysis, Second Edition 800
Mathematical models in hydrology 500
Butadiene hydroxytelechelic oligomers PBHT 500
Ecotourism 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 计算机科学 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 物理 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 人工智能 细胞生物学 无机化学 物理化学 数学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 8078370
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9495719
关于积分的说明 21389228
捐赠科研通 7646688
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3400682
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2530111
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2439427