体验式学习
操作化
元认知
生成语法
计算机科学
读写能力
心理学
过程(计算)
数学教育
教育技术
主动学习(机器学习)
生成模型
纪律
教育学
人工智能
比例(比率)
转化式学习
定性研究
形成性评价
适应性学习
批判性思维
领域(数学分析)
人工智能应用
教学方法
学习环境
知识管理
定性性质
出勤
领域知识
作者
Abram D. Anders,Emily Dux Speltz
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100482
摘要
Generative artificial intelligence (AI) creates both opportunities for enhanced learning and risks of skill erosion and dependency. This exploratory, mixed-methods study investigated how to design AI learning experiences using a human-centered approach that promotes student agency. We developed and investigated an integrated framework combining comprehensive generative AI literacies—functional, critical and ethical, and creative—with self-regulated learning (SRL) processes operationalized as a human-centered Plan, Iterate, Evaluate cycle. Thirty-eight undergraduate students enrolled in an “Artificial Intelligence and Writing” course completed scaffolded experiential challenges followed by self-directed creative projects. Quantitative analysis revealed significant growth in AI literacy self-efficacy across all dimensions, with students progressing from moderate initial confidence (M = 4.68, SD = 2.11) to high confidence levels (M = 8.39, SD = 1.04) on a 10-point scale (t = -9.86, p < .001). Qualitative analysis of project artifacts and student process reflections identified a taxonomy of human in the loop practices integrating AI literacies and self-regulation across the Plan, Iterate, Evaluate cycle. Planning practices involved activating domain knowledge to identify AI applications and establishing evaluative criteria. Iteration practices included developing multi-step workflows, refining prompts through dialogue, and monitoring output quality. Evaluation practices combined assessment of project outcomes with reflection on collaboration processes to inform future use. These practices illustrated adaptive human-AI collaboration strategies that augment rather than replace students’ disciplinary expertise and creative vision. These findings suggest scaffolded experiential learning integrating AI literacies and metacognitive processes can promote effective AI collaboration and empower students to actively direct their own learning. • Integrated AI literacies with self-regulated learning in Plan-Iterate-Evaluate cycle • Developed AI literacy self-efficacy measure with excellent reliability (α=.94-.96) • AI literacy self-efficacy increased significantly from M=4.68 to M=8.39 (p<.001) • Identified taxonomy of human in the loop practices for AI-enhanced learning • Experiential and project-based learning interventions promoted human agency with AI
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI