危害
不当行为
问责
国家(计算机科学)
犯罪学
公共关系
前景化
地平线
审查
社会学
心理学
执行
官僚主义
法律与经济学
组织理论
政治学
法学
组织行为学
组织研究
社会心理学
组织分析
实证研究
组织文化
归还
组织动力学
责备
过程(计算)
通知
组织学习
罪责
职位(财务)
脆弱性(计算)
作者
Jan Stephen Lodge,Grace Augustine,Mislav Radić
标识
DOI:10.5465/amj.2024.1166
摘要
The publicization of organizational harm is critical for enabling accountability and justice. While existing research offers valuable insights into how audiences label and sanction harm as misconduct, we know comparatively little about the early stages of such publicization—how knowledge of harm first moves from the private sphere to broader outsider awareness. In this study, we address this undertheorized phase in the misconduct literature by examining the UK Post Office Horizon IT scandal, in which more than 4,000 subpostmasters were wrongly accused of theft and false accounting over many years due to faults in an IT system. Our analysis reveals how a series of organizational moves produced a state of “response paralysis” among victims, leaving them unable or unwilling to speak out, thereby stalling publicization. We then show how this paralysis was gradually broken down, enabling victims to take the first steps toward making their experiences public. By foregrounding these early dynamics in the process of publicization, our study offers a more complete understanding of publicization and the broader lifecycle of organizational misconduct. Overall, the study enables scholars to better understand why some organizational harm remains hidden for years—or never comes to light at all.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI