随机对照试验
医院焦虑抑郁量表
物理疗法
生活质量(医疗保健)
焦虑
康复
心情
心理干预
认知行为疗法
冲程(发动机)
认知
萧条(经济学)
医学
心理学
临床心理学
物理医学与康复
精神科
内科学
心理治疗师
经济
宏观经济学
工程类
机械工程
作者
Joyce A. Kootker,S.M.C. Rasquin,Frederik C. Lem,Caroline van Heugten,Luciano Fasotti,Alexander C. H. Geurts
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2016.10.013
摘要
Abstract
Objective
To evaluate the effectiveness of individually tailored cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for reducing depressive symptoms with or without anxiety poststroke. Design
Multicenter, assessor-blinded, randomized controlled trial. Setting
Ambulatory rehabilitation setting. Participants
Patients who had a Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-depression subscale (HADS-D) score >7 at least 3 months poststroke (N=61). Interventions
Participants were randomly allocated to either augmented CBT or computerized cognitive training (CCT). The CBT intervention was based on the principles of recognizing, registering, and altering negative thoughts and cognitions. CBT was augmented with goal-directed real-life activity training given by an occupational or movement therapist. Main Outcome Measures
HADS-D was the primary outcome, and measures of participation and quality of life were secondary outcomes. Outcome measurements were performed at baseline, immediately posttreatment, and at 4- and 8-month follow-up. Analysis was performed with linear mixed models using group (CBT vs CCT) as the between-subjects factor and time (4 assessments) as the within-subjects factor. Results
Mixed model analyses showed a significant and persistent time effect for HADS-D (mean difference, −4.6; 95% confidence interval, −5.7 to −3.6; P<.001) and for participation and quality of life in both groups. There was no significant group × time effect for any of the outcome measures. Conclusions
Our augmented CBT intervention was not superior to CCT for the treatment of mood disorders after stroke. Future studies should determine whether both interventions are better than natural history.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI