代理(哲学)
医学
免疫
接种疫苗
公共卫生
采购
咨询委员会
公共卫生政策
监管机构
免疫学
临床试验
疫苗效力
业务
人类使用
免疫系统
风险分析(工程)
疾病根除
卫生政策
过程(计算)
心理干预
监管科学
持续时间(音乐)
运筹学
政治学
人类健康
公共关系
计算机科学
作者
William P. Hausdorff,Marco Cavaleri,Marion F. Gruber,Kwasi A. Nyarko,Andrew J. Pollard,Mateusz Hasso-Agopsowicz,Julie Joseph,Rakesh Aggarwal,Ernest Agyei-Kwame,Peter Dull,Pieter Neels,H. Bogaerts,Christopher Gill,Nancy Salts,Wenxi Tang,Birgitte Giersing
出处
期刊:Vaccine
[Elsevier BV]
日期:2026-01-23
卷期号:75: 128257-128257
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.vaccine.2026.128257
摘要
Combination vaccine formulations contain distinct components targeting multiple strains of a single pathogen or multiple pathogens. By minimizing the number of separate vaccine administrations required, combination vaccines have been critical in allowing the broad expansion of the number and range of diseases that can now be prevented by immunization. Recent advances in vaccine development and our understanding of the immune system now make it possible to envision how new combination vaccines could play a major role in helping immunization programs address a much wider range of emerging or still problematic pathogens. However, few combinations are currently in the pipeline, in part due to their inherently increased complexity and cost of development compared to standalone formulations. This complexity, in turn, is partly driven by the regulatory requirements surrounding the clinical study program for the combination vaccine, especially the primary clinical endpoints and the required degree of precision around those endpoints, as these ultimately determine the sample size, cost, and duration of the study. As part of a larger effort to facilitate combination vaccine development, vaccine experts at the World Health Organization and PATH coordinated a one-day meeting in March 2025 gathering current and former national regulatory agency staff from a dozen countries, together with vaccine developers, representatives from funding and procurement agencies, and public health and policy officials. The convened participants held spirited discussions on how multiple immune markers and controlled human infection models (CHIM) might contribute to the demonstration of vaccine efficacy. In addition, participants considered the possibility of relying on clinical endpoints when the vaccine components are directed against pathogens causing the same disease syndrome but etiological determination of each component's contribution is not feasible. Regulators welcomed scientifically sound, creative proposals for demonstration of efficacy, and agreed that the benefit-risk of the combination vaccine as a whole should be the primary focus.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI