医学
置信区间
无菌处理
危险系数
骨水泥
比例危险模型
相对风险
关节置换术
关节置换术
全膝关节置换术
感染风险
体质指数
倾向得分匹配
外科
内科学
水泥
遗传学
考古
生物
历史
作者
Robert S. Namba,Heather A. Prentice,Elizabeth W. Paxton,Adrian D. Hinman,Matthew P. Kelly
标识
DOI:10.2106/jbjs.19.01440
摘要
Background: The efficacy of commercially available antibiotic-loaded bone cement (ABC) in preventing infection in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is unclear. We sought to determine the effectiveness of commercially available ABC in reducing the risk of infection following TKA, both overall and among 3 subgroups of patients with a higher risk of infection (diabetes, body mass index ≥35 kg/m 2 , and American Society of Anesthesiologists classification ≥3), and to evaluate the association between the use of ABC and the risks of aseptic revision and revision for aseptic loosening. Methods: The Kaiser Permanente Total Joint Replacement Registry was utilized to evaluate 87,018 primary cemented TKAs performed from 2008 to 2016. The primary outcome was time to infection (90-day deep infection or septic revision). Reduced infection risk with ABC relative to regular cement was tested with use of propensity-score-weighted Cox proportional-hazards models with superiority and noninferiority testing. All analyses were replicated for each of the 3 high-risk subgroups. For the secondary revision outcomes, propensity-score-weighted Cox proportional-hazards models were utilized. Results: Regular cement was found to be noninferior to ABC with respect to risk infection (hazard ratio [HR], 1.14; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.93 to 1.40) and cost across all TKA patients. However, a lower risk of infection was observed with ABC among TKA patients with diabetes (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.52 to 0.99). There was no evidence of a difference in risk of revision for ABC compared with regular cement. Conclusions: We found that the additional cost associated with the use of commercially prepared ABC in primary TKA was not justified in all patients; however, the risk of reduction was lower among patients with diabetes who received ABC. Further study is warranted to identify the efficacy of ABC among other high-risk populations. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI