How Do Consumers Interact with Digital Expert Advice? Experimental Evidence from Health Insurance

产品(数学) 采购 营销 背景(考古学) 建议(编程) 业务 价值(数学) 消费者选择 广告 计算机科学 几何学 数学 生物 机器学习 古生物学 程序设计语言
作者
M. Kate Bundorf,Maria Polyakova,Ming Tai-Seale
出处
期刊:Management Science [Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences]
卷期号:70 (11): 7617-7643 被引量:9
标识
DOI:10.1287/mnsc.2020.02453
摘要

Consumers increasingly use digital advice when making purchasing decisions. How do such tools change consumer behavior and what types of consumers are likely to use them? We examine these questions with a randomized controlled trial of digital expert advice in the context of prescription drug insurance. The intervention we study was effective at changing consumer choices. We propose that, conceptually, expert advice can affect consumer choices through two distinct channels: by updating consumer beliefs about product features (learning) and by influencing how much consumers value product features (interpretation). Using our trial data to estimate a model of consumer demand, we find that both channels are quantitatively important. Digital expert advice tools not only provide consumers with information, but also alter how consumers value product features. For example, consumers are willing to pay 14% less for a plan with the most popular brand and 37% less for an extra star rating when they incorporate digital expert advice on plan choice relative to only having information about product features. Further, we document substantial selection into the use of digital advice on two margins. Consumers who are inherently less active shoppers and those who we predict would have responded to advice more were less likely to demand it. Our results raise concerns regarding the ability of digital advice to alter consumer preferences as well as the distributional implications of greater access to digital expert advice. This paper was accepted by Stefan Scholtes, healthcare management. Funding: This work was supported by the National Institute on Aging [Grant K01AG059843] and the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute [Grant CDR-1306-03598]. The project also received financial support from Stanford Innovation Funds. Supplemental Material: The online appendix and data files are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2020.02453 .
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
糊涂的天思完成签到 ,获得积分10
刚刚
刚刚
zzzzzz完成签到,获得积分20
1秒前
虫虫完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
TX完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
唐俊杰完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
未何发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
2秒前
李艳霞完成签到,获得积分20
2秒前
欢呼的小玉完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
帅气的听白完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
Lan完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
吉尼斯贝贝完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
ch发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
喜喜喜嘻嘻嘻完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
飞飞发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
周子淦发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
10秒前
11秒前
12秒前
烟花应助崔嘉坤采纳,获得10
12秒前
清清子完成签到,获得积分20
12秒前
NexusExplorer应助guoxiangzhao采纳,获得10
12秒前
HP发布了新的文献求助30
15秒前
白水发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
清清子发布了新的文献求助20
16秒前
17秒前
18秒前
奕苼发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
lilili应助我要资料啊采纳,获得10
18秒前
情怀应助cc采纳,获得10
19秒前
二狗发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
liufan完成签到 ,获得积分10
20秒前
所所应助ICEY采纳,获得10
20秒前
ddk发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
23秒前
白水完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
顾矜应助开朗盼兰采纳,获得10
26秒前
FJ发布了新的文献求助30
26秒前
walter应助最长的旅途采纳,获得10
27秒前
高分求助中
Psychopathic Traits and Quality of Prison Life 1000
Chemistry and Physics of Carbon Volume 18 800
The formation of Australian attitudes towards China, 1918-1941 660
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
天津市智库成果选编 600
Forced degradation and stability indicating LC method for Letrozole: A stress testing guide 500
全相对论原子结构与含时波包动力学的理论研究--清华大学 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6451729
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8263452
关于积分的说明 17608388
捐赠科研通 5516377
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2903719
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1880647
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1722664