Controversies in Vaccine Mandates

担心 授权 免疫 麻疹 医学 接种疫苗 激励 大流行 医疗保健 公共关系 家庭医学 疾病 政治学 经济增长 2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19) 免疫学 传染病(医学专业) 经济 精神科 焦虑 病理 抗原 法学 微观经济学
作者
John D. Lantos,Mary Anne Jackson,Douglas J. Opel,Edgar K. Marcuse,Angela Myers,Beverly L. Connelly
出处
期刊:Current Problems in Pediatric and Adolescent Health Care [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:40 (3): 38-58 被引量:52
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.cppeds.2010.01.003
摘要

Policies that mandate immunization have always been controversial. The controversies take different forms in different contexts. For routine childhood immunizations, many parents have fears about both short- and long-term side effects. Parental worries change as the rate of vaccination in the community changes. When most children are vaccinated, parents worry more about side effects than they do about disease. Because of these worries, immunization rates go down. As immunization rates go down, disease rates go up, and parents worry less about side effects of vaccination and more about the complications of the diseases. Immunization rates then go up. For teenagers, controversies arise about the criteria that should guide policies that mandate, rather than merely recommend and encourage, certain immunizations. In particular, policy makers have questioned whether immunizations for human papillomavirus, or other diseases that are not contagious, should be required. For healthcare workers, debates have focused on the strength of institutional mandates. For years, experts have recommended that all healthcare workers be immunized against influenza. Immunizations for other infections including pertussis, measles, mumps, and hepatitis are encouraged but few hospitals have mandated such immunizations-instead, they rely on incentives and education. Pandemics present a different set of problems as people demand vaccines that are in short supply. These issues erupt into controversy on a regular basis. Physicians and policy makers must respond both in their individual practices and as advisory experts to national and state agencies. The articles in this volume will discuss the evolution of national immunization programs in these various settings. We will critically examine the role of vaccine mandates. We will discuss ways that practitioners and public health officials should deal with vaccine refusal. We will contrast responses of the population as a whole, within the healthcare setting, and in the setting of pandemic influenza.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
OnlyHarbour发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
芒果彩虹猪完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
我是老大的应助被等待听安采纳,获得10
2秒前
louming完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
anan完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
ying发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
世纪完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
Sledge的应助被悲凉的向露采纳,获得10
3秒前
木木发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
橘柚完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
justonce发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
5秒前
6秒前
111发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
molihuakai的应助被斯文的鹰采纳,获得10
7秒前
kkkk完成签到,获得积分20
7秒前
爱卿5271发布了新的文献求助20
8秒前
8秒前
晴天完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
受伤的静柏完成签到,获得积分20
9秒前
wanci的应助被向着阳光奔跑采纳,获得10
9秒前
shuo0976完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
cfw发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
11秒前
从容语海发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
12秒前
淡定若发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
blink完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
zqy完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
木生离完成签到 ,获得积分10
14秒前
飘逸灵薇完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
跳跃忆灵完成签到,获得积分20
15秒前
15秒前
16秒前
lyra1111完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
鲤鱼香旋发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Rosenblum, Global Change Biology 800
自動車の空力技術 800
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe (GGB), Band 5: Pro–Soz 300
Die Religion in Geschichte und Gegenwart (RGG), 4. Auflage, Band 7: R–S 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 工程类 有机化学 物理 复合材料 生物化学 内科学 细胞生物学 基因 遗传学 免疫学 冶金 光电子学 癌症研究
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7790022
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9327554
关于积分的说明 20418946
捐赠科研通 7379554
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3322967
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2470897
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2339810