Controversies in Vaccine Mandates

担心 授权 免疫 麻疹 医学 接种疫苗 激励 大流行 医疗保健 公共关系 家庭医学 疾病 政治学 经济增长 2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19) 免疫学 传染病(医学专业) 经济 精神科 焦虑 病理 抗原 法学 微观经济学
作者
John D. Lantos,Mary Anne Jackson,Douglas J. Opel,Edgar K. Marcuse,Angela Myers,Beverly L. Connelly
出处
期刊:Current Problems in Pediatric and Adolescent Health Care [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:40 (3): 38-58 被引量:52
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.cppeds.2010.01.003
摘要

Policies that mandate immunization have always been controversial. The controversies take different forms in different contexts. For routine childhood immunizations, many parents have fears about both short- and long-term side effects. Parental worries change as the rate of vaccination in the community changes. When most children are vaccinated, parents worry more about side effects than they do about disease. Because of these worries, immunization rates go down. As immunization rates go down, disease rates go up, and parents worry less about side effects of vaccination and more about the complications of the diseases. Immunization rates then go up. For teenagers, controversies arise about the criteria that should guide policies that mandate, rather than merely recommend and encourage, certain immunizations. In particular, policy makers have questioned whether immunizations for human papillomavirus, or other diseases that are not contagious, should be required. For healthcare workers, debates have focused on the strength of institutional mandates. For years, experts have recommended that all healthcare workers be immunized against influenza. Immunizations for other infections including pertussis, measles, mumps, and hepatitis are encouraged but few hospitals have mandated such immunizations-instead, they rely on incentives and education. Pandemics present a different set of problems as people demand vaccines that are in short supply. These issues erupt into controversy on a regular basis. Physicians and policy makers must respond both in their individual practices and as advisory experts to national and state agencies. The articles in this volume will discuss the evolution of national immunization programs in these various settings. We will critically examine the role of vaccine mandates. We will discuss ways that practitioners and public health officials should deal with vaccine refusal. We will contrast responses of the population as a whole, within the healthcare setting, and in the setting of pandemic influenza.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
Bio举报风清扬求助涉嫌违规
1秒前
1秒前
辉辉发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
1秒前
沉默的夏天完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
哈哈哈哈完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
3秒前
Cheung2121发布了新的文献求助30
4秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
niuniu完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
Panda_Zhou发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
hhp发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
ddanren发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
斯文败类应助没问题采纳,获得10
6秒前
7秒前
勤奋无剑发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
MPC发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
苗条发箍完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
葡萄树发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
小新发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
9秒前
9秒前
zzj完成签到,获得积分20
11秒前
完美的沉鱼完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
研友_yLpQrn发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
12秒前
简单点发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
Orange应助Panda_Zhou采纳,获得10
13秒前
大个应助tanglu采纳,获得10
13秒前
京京完成签到,获得积分20
14秒前
Huy_rin发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
动生电动势完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
陈龙完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
称心乐枫发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
无私的颤完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
苏卿应助科研通管家采纳,获得30
17秒前
斯文败类应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
18秒前
高分求助中
(禁止应助)【重要!!请各位详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Logical form: From GB to Minimalism 5000
Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches 5th Edition 2000
Linear and Nonlinear Functional Analysis with Applications, Second Edition 1800
International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (Madrid Code) (Regnum Vegetabile) 1500
Biocontamination Control for Pharmaceuticals and Healthcare 2nd Edition 1300
Stereoelectronic Effects 1000
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 4201816
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3736692
关于积分的说明 11766001
捐赠科研通 3409158
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1870485
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 926092
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 836385