多学科方法
背景(考古学)
规范性
社会学
多样性(控制论)
价值(数学)
独创性
医疗保健
卫生政策
公共关系
纪律
工程伦理学
社会科学
政治学
定性研究
计算机科学
法学
古生物学
人工智能
机器学习
生物
工程类
作者
Peter Littlejohns,Albert Weale,Kalipso Chalkidou,Ruth Faden,Yot Teerawattananon
出处
期刊:Journal of Health Organisation and Management
[Emerald Publishing Limited]
日期:2012-06-15
卷期号:26 (3): 285-292
被引量:38
标识
DOI:10.1108/14777261211238945
摘要
Purpose This editorial aims to outline the context of healthcare priority‐setting, and summarise each of the other ten papers in this special edition. It introduces a new multidisciplinary research programme drawing on ethics, philosophy, health economics, political science and health technology assessment, out of which the papers in this edition have arisen. Design/methodology/approach Key normative concepts are introduced and policy and research context provided to frame subsequent papers in the edition. Findings Common challenges of health priority‐setting are faced by many countries across the world, and a range of social value judgments is in play as resource allocation decisions are made. Although the challenges faced by different countries are in many ways similar, the way in which social values affect the processes and content of priority‐setting decisions means that those challenges are resolved very differently in a variety of social, political, cultural and institutional settings, as subsequent papers in this edition demonstrate. How social values affect decision making in this way is the subject of a new multi‐disciplinary research programme. Originality/value Technical analyses of health priority setting are commonplace, but approaching the issues from the perspective of social values and conducting comparative analyses across countries with very different cultural, social and institutional contexts provides the content for a new research agenda.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI