Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards 2022 (CHEERS 2022) Statement: Updated Reporting Guidance for Health Economic Evaluations

检查表 背景(考古学) 医疗保健 公共卫生 利益相关者 语句(逻辑) 公共关系 经济评价 医学 政治学 心理学 护理部 法学 古生物学 病理 认知心理学 生物
作者
Don Husereau,Michael Drummond,Federico Augustovski,Esther W. de Bekker‐Grob,Andrew Briggs,Chris Carswell,Lisa Caulley,Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk,Dan Greenberg,Elizabeth Loder,Josephine Mauskopf,C. Daniel Mullins,Stavros Petrou,Raoh‐Fang Pwu,Sophie Staniszewska
出处
期刊:Value in Health [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:25 (1): 3-9 被引量:863
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.jval.2021.11.1351
摘要

Health economic evaluations are comparative analyses of alternative courses of action in terms of their costs and consequences. The Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement, published in 2013, was created to ensure health economic evaluations are identifiable, interpretable, and useful for decision making. It was intended as guidance to help authors report accurately which health interventions were being compared and in what context, how the evaluation was undertaken, what the findings were, and other details that may aid readers and reviewers in interpretation and use of the study. The new CHEERS 2022 statement replaces previous CHEERS reporting guidance. It reflects the need for guidance that can be more easily applied to all types of health economic evaluation, new methods and developments in the field, as well as the increased role of stakeholder involvement including patients and the public. It is also broadly applicable to any form of intervention intended to improve the health of individuals or the population, whether simple or complex, and without regard to context (such as health care, public health, education, social care, etc). This summary article presents the new CHEERS 2022 28-item checklist and recommendations for each item. The CHEERS 2022 statement is primarily intended for researchers reporting economic evaluations for peer reviewed journals as well as the peer reviewers and editors assessing them for publication. However, we anticipate familiarity with reporting requirements will be useful for analysts when planning studies. It may also be useful for health technology assessment bodies seeking guidance on reporting, as there is an increasing emphasis on transparency in decision making.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
草莓苹果发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
彭于晏的应助被飞行中的鱼采纳,获得10
1秒前
zhao完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
小许的大米14完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
华仔的应助被哈哈哈采纳,获得10
2秒前
打打的应助被赖风娇采纳,获得10
2秒前
HC发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
2秒前
穆洋发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
Duanxy完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
七星鱼发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
付帅完成签到,获得积分20
4秒前
imemorizedpi完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
梦梦完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
完美世界的应助被淼淼采纳,获得10
5秒前
6秒前
Kobe发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
大大的寄吧完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
快乐小夏发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
哭泣黄蜂发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
7秒前
7秒前
8秒前
饱满如风发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
是羊羊吖完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
英姑的应助被小雒雒采纳,获得10
9秒前
小巧的花生完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
哦豁完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
HF7发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
栗子完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
lob7发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
kkk关闭了kkk的文献求助
10秒前
格非完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
huihui发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
Pauline完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
11秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Aspects of Post-SPE Phonology 2000
Performance standards for antimicrobial disk and dilution susceptibility tests for bacteria isolated from animals 888
Rosenblum, Global Change Biology 800
Holistic Discourse Analysis, Second Edition by Robert E. Longacre (2012-09-10) 666
Berberine regulates the TLR4 signaling pathway to suppress hypoxia-induced proliferation and migration of pulmonary arterial smooth muscle cells 530
Organizational Behavior 510
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 计算机科学 工程类 纳米技术 物理 有机化学 化学工程 内科学 生物化学 复合材料 催化作用 心理学 细胞生物学 无机化学 电极 光电子学 人工智能
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7860780
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9378814
关于积分的说明 20719245
捐赠科研通 7460339
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3347303
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2489222
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2372002