正确性
规划师
通知
计算机科学
数学证明
形式化方法
主动安全
控制(管理)
风险分析(工程)
事件(粒子物理)
形式验证
可靠性工程
工程类
软件工程
汽车工程
人工智能
程序设计语言
物理
法学
几何学
医学
量子力学
数学
政治学
作者
Jonas Krook,Roozbeh Kianfar,Martin Fabian
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.ifacol.2021.04.059
摘要
Automated vehicles need a safe back-up solution in the presence of system degradations since a driver cannot be expected to take control on short notice. In the event of a degradation, the vehicle is required to reach a minimal risk condition via a minimal risk maneuver. The activation of such maneuvers is safety critical, and a correct implementation of the tactical planner that takes the activation decision is paramount. One way to ensure correctness is to employ formal methods since they can provide proofs thereof. Earlier, a tactical planner was formally verified to activate a minimal risk maneuver if and only if a failure occurs. Formal verification has some drawbacks, so this paper investigates the applicability of using the tools Supremica and TuLiP to synthesize correct-by-construction tactical planners. These two tools amend some of the verification’s drawbacks, but also introduce their own.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI