骄傲
心理学
社会心理学
比例(比率)
二元分析
统计
拟合优度
结构方程建模
差异(会计)
索引(排版)
数学
计算机科学
地理
地图学
政治学
业务
法学
万维网
会计
作者
Conghui Liu,Weijun Lai,Guoliang Yu,Chuansheng Chen
标识
DOI:10.1080/01973533.2014.883516
摘要
Abstract Three studies were conducted to investigate the individual and collective facets of pride. Studies 1 and 2 demonstrated the existence of three facets of pride (individual, relational, and national). The Individual and Collective Pride Scale (ICPS) was developed and found to have good reliability and validity. Study 3 showed that relational pride could be enhanced by priming interdependent self-construals. These findings suggested that pride can be subdivided into individual, relational, and national facets and that the ICPS is a reliable and valid instrument for the assessment of pride. Notes Note. r = bivariate Pearson correlation coefficient; β = regression coefficient pertaining to the focal variable after controlling for gender, age, and the other two facets of pride; ΔR 2 = additional variance explained by the addition of the focal facet of pride. *p < .05. **p < .01. Note. p 1 was for Δχ2 comparing the current model with the previous model. GFI = goodness-of-fit index; AGFI = adjusted goodness-of-fit index; NNFI = non-normed fix index; CFI = comparative fit index; RMSEA = root mean square error of approximation; AIC = Akaike Information Criterion. Note. r = bivariate Pearson correlation coefficient; β = regression coefficient pertaining to the focal variable after controlling for gender, grade, and the other two facets of pride when analyzing the data from Individual and Collective Pride Scale. When examining the unique contributions of either National Pride in Specific Achievements or General National Pride, we controlled for Individual Pride and Relational Pride, but not other measures of national pride. ΔR 2 = additional variance explained by the addition of the focal facet of pride. *p < .05. **p < .01. Note. r = bivariate Pearson correlation coefficient; β = regression coefficient pertaining to the focal variable after controlling for gender, grade, and the other two facets of pride when analyzing the data from Individual and Collective Pride Scale. When examining the unique contributions of either National Pride in Specific Achievements or General National Pride, we controlled for Individual Pride and Relational Pride, but not other measures of national pride. ΔR 2 = additional variance explained by the addition of the focal facet of pride. *p < .05. **p < .01.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI