FAST and Furious About Quality: Impact of Continuous Review and Feedback on Point-of-Care Ultrasound Examinations

医学 超声聚焦评估外伤 检测点注意事项 超声波 创伤中心 气胸 护理点超声 入射(几何) 急诊医学 放射科 外科 腹部外伤 回顾性队列研究 迟钝的 病理 物理 光学
作者
Nicholas C. Reis,Erin A. Handspiker,Wayne B. Bauerle,Vanessa Reese,Adam Benton,Roberto Castillo,Lisa K. Robins,Christine L. Ramirez,M.A. Braverman,Peter Thomas
出处
期刊:American Surgeon [SAGE Publishing]
卷期号:90 (11): 2857-2861
标识
DOI:10.1177/00031348241257465
摘要

Background: Focused Assessment with Sonography in Trauma (FAST) examination is a point-of-care ultrasound study used to evaluate for abdominal hemorrhage, pneumothorax, or pericardial blood in trauma patients as an adjunct to their initial assessment. The quality of the image can be limited, and its diagnostic value is heavily dependent on operator skill. Our objective was to determine whether a standardized review process improved image quality and reduced incidence of nondiagnostic or insufficient imaging by 10% over a 6-month period. Study Design: Between July 1, 2021, and March 31, 2022, we evaluated 1106 trauma activations at our level II trauma center. Two exams per practitioner per month were reviewed by an emergency medicine trained traumatologist with specialized training in point-of-care ultrasound and board certification in echocardiography. Priority was given to exams on patients with known injuries identified on other studies. If there were no exams that matched these criteria, random exams were selected. Images were reviewed for image quality, diagnostic accuracy, and labeling with counseling given to the provider if indicated. Categorical variables were compared using chi squared analysis, while continuous non-normally distributed variables were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. Results: A total of 305 FAST exams were reviewed (186 pre-intervention and 119 during intervention). Image quality improved from 46.3% (n = 31/65) to 79.0% (n = 94/119) ( P < .01) with need for counseling falling from 63.1% (n = 41/65) pre-QI to 42.0% (n = 50/119) post-QI ( P < .01). Incidence of detectable injury, BMI, ISS, and AIS body regions were consistent across the study period. This was seen in both the geriatric and non-geriatric cohorts despite a significant increase in ISS in the post-intervention geriatric patients. Discussion: A FAST review program is associated with improvement in image quality and decreased need for counseling of trauma providers.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
2秒前
junkersykj完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
binhunu完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
cdercder应助次氯酸采纳,获得10
4秒前
迷路小丸子完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
8秒前
上官若男应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
8秒前
Jasper应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
8秒前
英俊的铭应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
9秒前
DW应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
9秒前
9秒前
乐乐应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
9秒前
今后应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
9秒前
研友_VZG7GZ应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
9秒前
安子应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
9秒前
9秒前
研友_VZG7GZ应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
10秒前
10秒前
10秒前
NexusExplorer应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
10秒前
小蘑菇应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
10秒前
ding应助科研通管家采纳,获得30
10秒前
赘婿应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
11秒前
丘比特应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
11秒前
Vanilla应助科研通管家采纳,获得50
11秒前
lin完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
上官若男应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
11秒前
一去应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
11秒前
11秒前
谢谢大侠完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
12秒前
12秒前
12秒前
12秒前
come应助momo采纳,获得10
13秒前
sang关注了科研通微信公众号
13秒前
baiyixuan发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
15秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Essentials of Carbohydrate Chemistry and Biochemistry, 4th Edition 800
Navigating Normative Orders. Interdisciplinary Perspectives 800
A Psychological Understanding of Criticism and Mental Health 600
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7752472
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9299532
关于积分的说明 20252864
捐赠科研通 7334710
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3310265
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2461612
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2323041