摘要
The Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Clinical Practice Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) updates the KDIGO 2012 guideline and has been developed with patient partners, clinicians, and researchers around the world, using robust methodology. This update, based on a substantially broader base of evidence than has previously been available, reflects an exciting time in nephrology. New therapies and strategies have been tested in large and diverse populations that help to inform care; however, this guideline is not intended for people receiving dialysis nor those who have a kidney transplant. The document is sensitive to international considerations, CKD across the lifespan, and discusses special considerations in implementation. The scope includes chapters dedicated to the evaluation and risk assessment of people with CKD, management to delay CKD progression and its complications, medication management and drug stewardship in CKD, and optimal models of CKD care. Treatment approaches and actionable guideline recommendations are based on systematic reviews of relevant studies and appraisal of the quality of the evidence and the strength of recommendations which followed the “Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation” (GRADE) approach. The limitations of the evidence are discussed. The guideline also provides practice points, which serve to direct clinical care or activities for which a systematic review was not conducted, and it includes useful infographics and describes an important research agenda for the future. It targets a broad audience of people with CKD and their healthcare, while being mindful of implications for policy and payment. The Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Clinical Practice Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) updates the KDIGO 2012 guideline and has been developed with patient partners, clinicians, and researchers around the world, using robust methodology. This update, based on a substantially broader base of evidence than has previously been available, reflects an exciting time in nephrology. New therapies and strategies have been tested in large and diverse populations that help to inform care; however, this guideline is not intended for people receiving dialysis nor those who have a kidney transplant. The document is sensitive to international considerations, CKD across the lifespan, and discusses special considerations in implementation. The scope includes chapters dedicated to the evaluation and risk assessment of people with CKD, management to delay CKD progression and its complications, medication management and drug stewardship in CKD, and optimal models of CKD care. Treatment approaches and actionable guideline recommendations are based on systematic reviews of relevant studies and appraisal of the quality of the evidence and the strength of recommendations which followed the “Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation” (GRADE) approach. The limitations of the evidence are discussed. The guideline also provides practice points, which serve to direct clinical care or activities for which a systematic review was not conducted, and it includes useful infographics and describes an important research agenda for the future. It targets a broad audience of people with CKD and their healthcare, while being mindful of implications for policy and payment. This 2024 update of the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Clinical Practice Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) heralds a new era in the care of people with kidney diseases. The majority of statements from the 2012 guideline have been updated based on current knowledge and practice. Only 6 statements were retained in their original form in 2012. There is clear and increasing recognition of CKD as a global public health problem. The inclusion of people with CKD in clinical trials has improved substantially, thus generating an evidence base upon which to recommend care and treatments that have not previously existed. There are increasing efforts to improve diagnostic evaluation of cause, with increased sophistication of imaging methods, biopsy interrogation, and genetic evaluation, as well as methods to optimize blood and urine testing. With advances in technology, such as molecular diagnostics for tissue samples, integrated omics platforms, and the use of machine learning/artificial intelligence to explore large databases of both clinical and biological data, we are truly at the beginning of a new era in nephrology. This guideline integrates existing and new knowledge to guide the care of people with CKD. It has been developed by an international Work Group that included patient partners, clinicians, and researchers with diverse experience across the spectrum of populations, a dedicated Evidence Review Team, and professional KDIGO staff. This clinical practice guideline includes 2 different types of statements: graded recommendations, which are supported by systematic reviews (i.e., de novo reviews conducted by the independent Evidence Review Team or existing high-quality reviews that have been systematically identified), and ungraded practice points, which serve to direct clinical care or activities for which a systematic review was not conducted for various reasons (e.g., lack of a sufficient evidence base or randomized controlled trials that would be impractical/unethical). Both recommendations and practice points are intended to help guide clinical practice and aid in decision-making; thus, collectively are the guideline statements. They are clearly articulated, actionable, and presented together so that all guideline statements can be implemented. The distinction between them is based on the process by which they are derived, and that process is based on the framework methodology from the KDIGO Methods Committee and aligns with other international guideline groups using the “Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation” (GRADE) methodology. New developments in the refinement of evaluation of glomerular filtration rate (GFR), population and individual risk prediction, and novel treatments have all positively influenced the prognosis for people with CKD and are presented here. The Work Group has aimed to generate a guideline that is both rigorously devoted to new and existing evidence, and that is clinically useful. Research recommendations are presented in a separate section of the document and are intended to guide the next set of important research questions to inform and improve the outcomes of people living with CKD. We specifically urge the community to be inclusive of people across the lifecycle and include sex (referring to biological factors including genetics, sex steroids, physiology, and anatomy), gender (referring to sociocultural factors such as identity, roles, and relations), and etiology of CKD as important variables in all studies. We offer recommendations to clinicians and clinical laboratories to understand and promote the standardization and accuracy of testing tools including assays and equipment. The effective use of clinical practice guidelines and, therefore, effective patient care, including accurate diagnosis and referral prioritization, clinical research, and public health prioritization, requires comparability of laboratory results independent of time, place, and measurement procedure. Key to this is establishing precision of testing and between-laboratory agreement with traceability to accepted international reference standards wherever available. Therefore, this guidance document includes standards for laboratory tests. Specifically, we focus on creatinine and cystatin C, with the goal of normalizing access to both tests for increased accuracy of GFR assessment, and the assessment of urine albumin which is also critical to risk assessment and care plans. The guideline is organized into 6 chapters (Tables 1, 4, and 5 cover Chapters 1–5). In this summary, we outline the key evidence-based recommendations together with selected practice points by chapter. Readers are referred to the full guideline for a comprehensive description of benefits and harms, certainty of evidence, values and preferences, resource use and costs, factors affecting implementation, special considerations, and both general and specific research recommendations.Table 1Recommendations and practice points from Chapters 1 and 2 of the KDIGO 2024 Clinical Practice Guideline for Evaluation and Management of CKDChapter 1. Evaluation of CKD1.1 Detection and evaluation of CKD1.1.1 Detection of CKDPractice people at risk for and with kidney (CKD) using both urine albumin measurement and assessment of glomerular filtration rate of or GFR tests to of Methods for of In at risk for CKD, we recommend using glomerular filtration rate cystatin is available, the GFR be from the of creatinine and cystatin and cystatin glomerular filtration rate Evaluation of of of a of can be of of of of or and urine such as kidney and in such as and to or to and the not based upon a for and as the be the of a kidney or kidney of treatments for CKD at of GFR or CKD is to of other clinical Evaluation of the of CKD using clinical and and laboratory and genetic and diagnosis in full tests to a based on 6 in full We a kidney biopsy as an diagnostic to and guide clinically Evaluation of of the to the specific kidney of glomerular the general with the of of the to and other creatinine and an for assessment of GFR in full We recommend using in clinical is accurate and GFR clinical in full accurate of GFR GFR using or of an filtration in full the and limitations in both and glomerular filtration rate as well as the and factors that and cystatin of requires of the for in a in GFR the use of cystatin glomerular filtration rate in specific the implications of between and as be in both and of those urine for creatinine is not and is to be to clinical the laboratory standards of care in in full to accuracy and GFR using creatinine and cystatin clinical laboratories the of measurement of both creatinine and cystatin as an or as a referred creatinine in or their quality process include the of the of values for the of the use of creatinine assays in the of to creatinine in using the and the of and in the can be as in and the of 2 of GFR We recommend using a GFR to GFR from filtration than on the filtration the and and as large as such for and of in the of be GFR in using that have been developed or in Evaluation of for and other the for testing of of In all a in the is in and for albumin and with urine use the for with for with accurate methods is using accurate by laboratory measurement and as a to urine creatinine wherever (i.e., the or tests are on a urine with a in the urine factors that of of urine albumin and urine creatinine and tests as in full In a urine for testing of and of urine and urine for and for albumin with for and for albumin with to clinical the laboratory and standards in in full to accuracy and of the urine of an quality assessment for urine albumin and including of the is a practice for We that testing be for creatinine and urine albumin measurement access to a laboratory is or a at the the clinical a is for creatinine and urine albumin that the and quality to the and of the including quality assessment, and the of the is a for creatinine testing is being generate an of the with that the a is being for the of also creatinine and an is the of the to a in of people with or as of the evaluation and of using the assessment in people with on for progression of CKD based upon GFR and in or in and GFR at in people with and GFR for at risk of CKD progression measurement people with CKD, a in of on a the and people with CKD who GFR of on testing the and of people with CKD, a of the on a laboratory and in people with In people with CKD we recommend using an risk to the risk of kidney kidney risk of can be to for referral in to based on or urine and other clinical kidney risk of can be to the of care in to and other clinical kidney risk of can be to the of for kidney including access or referral for in to and other clinical that risk developed for use in people with CKD not be for use in those with CKD in people with and kidney of risk in people with CKDPractice risk to guide therapies in people with CKD, use models that are developed CKD populations or that and risk to guide of care, use models that specifically developed in the CKD kidney Kidney Disease: Improving Global in full 6 in full in full in full in full in full in full in full in a new and practice points from of the KDIGO 2024 Clinical Practice Guideline for Evaluation and Management of CKDChapter CKD progression and its CKD and risk people with CKD with a comprehensive to of progression of CKD and its in full people with CKD to with and of an optimal and not to use to and (e.g., or and and be and use specific recommendations or practice and We recommend that people with CKD be to for a of at or to a with their and Recommendations for of other and access to with CKD be to people at risk of on the of or and the of or people with and CKD to with CKD to for (i.e., and to a people with CKD to and diverse with a of to and a of or to people with CKD and to their individual and of CKD and other We a of in with CKD in with CKD at risk of In with CKD who are and and who are at risk of kidney a with or to not or in people with not in with CKD to the risk of The and in with CKD be at the of the for to promote optimal In with such as and and We that be of of or of in people with CKD is not for with for with CKD who have blood for and We that with and CKD be with a blood of using measurement in people with risk of and or We that in with CKD, by blood be to for and a with and with in with In with CKD, is not available, it is to in a of for and this is by or of to the KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline for Management in Chronic Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes Work Clinical Practice Guideline for Management in Chronic Kidney for specific recommendations, practice points, and research We recommend or for people with CKD and increased We or for people with CKD and increased We recommend or for people with CKD and increased and with We recommend of and direct in people with CKD, with or or be using the that is to the benefits the benefits were in trials using in and be of or in the of a on the current GFR and with use of can be by to the than the or or creatinine by than of or an in the or or in the of or or to while kidney glomerular filtration rate people with CKD with to increased on or for specific (e.g., to or with or in people with CKD the We recommend with 2 CKD, and an with an an is it is to an the it is not or is It is to of or critical people be at risk for We recommend with CKD with an for the with urine of of or use not of of CKD and the in on is not an to We with to with urine with an We a with kidney or for with an and of are for with who are at risk of CKD progression and as by other be to a and an for of and CKD in risk of people with and of a in full The of a with kidney or be for of or or a in glomerular people with a In with and CKD who have not targets use of and or who are to use those we recommend a The of with In people with CKD, use of with or to of with clinical implications (e.g., in for to it not in the of and not or in of factors on of the of laboratory as well as factors and that measurement including and samples, and the of of or with to the management of to and in specific recommendations or practice specific recommendations or practice an in people with CKD and that includes and and into and quality of and a or an are to the of in (e.g., for people with CKD who have a of or as a in which risk be a to the KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline for in Chronic Kidney Disease for specific recommendations, and of specific and research to the KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline for the and Treatment of Chronic Kidney and for specific recommendations, of specific and research We recommend people with CKD and be for people with CKD their of is or is in to in people with CKD and of in CKD, or are to which help include and We not using to in people with CKD and to delay CKD progression and specific to In with not with dialysis or kidney we recommend with a or In with CKD and we recommend with a In with CKD not with dialysis or kidney we in people with or of the or of or risk using a risk In people with CKD, to the in to the In with CKD a (i.e., of or also be for of to people with CKD who have an for their a in to to of We recommend for of (i.e., in people with CKD and other (e.g., is for We that in an using is an to an management with an be for people with CKD with or of (e.g., patient to or CKD and strategies for the diagnosis and management of in full We recommend use of in to (e.g., for in in people with CKD for GFR is with at CKD of to and of GFR in full kidney Kidney Disease: Improving Global in full in full in full in full in a new and practice points from Chapters and 5 of the KDIGO 2024 Clinical Practice Guideline for Evaluation and Management of CKDChapter management and drug stewardship in and for with CKD be to the of such to people with CKD, the benefits and medication in people with CKD receiving with or both in practice and in Review and the use of and or that be for people with to people with CKD who are of review and and in with the values and of the with by of GFR by the people and clinical using are for drug accuracy is for (e.g., to or drug or clinical be use of that both creatinine and cystatin C, or GFR be In people with of for be for with a or a to be and drug in people of the filtration or of are not in a and drug medication review and at of care to and drug people with CKD have medication and are by are an a clear of to the to the and and in the of as and in the to or the management of as a to that to the or to Practice to promote drug and inform people with CKD the benefits and of so that they can and that can be with other and use tools to and improve drug stewardship in people with CKD to management of their medication the for imaging studies in with general population and benefits of imaging studies be on an individual in the of their and the risk for in people with CKD receiving for using The of can be in with statements from the in people with or GFR people with GFR who offer them of and models of to kidney care with CKD to kidney care in the in in full and to kidney care in the of a of or on a well and not in or of the kidney and or CKD, in and of specific recommendations or practice and assessment of people with CKD (e.g., and of at using a assessment of Management of for people with CKDPractice management strategies to people to well with CKD and improve their quality of people with CKD or such as or for using a assessment of for people with of the of or not integrated access to a care of medication and different dialysis access and and care for people with that also care are important to promote people with the use of including and in the of and from to and their for to care at of by using to and guide and by of the in full a comprehensive summary, and an to the receiving including all relevant as well as the and in full people to care of and that people of with CKD are a population at risk for outcomes at in to people to the care to which they be the in full people with CKD than people with the of CKD and, with the agreement of the include the or other of the in their care, at in the from care in full the of dialysis based on a assessment of a preferences, of and laboratory dialysis the of or of the is in full This not in the GFR between 5 and for kidney dialysis access in the GFR is or risk of is 2 In in to the for to and management is an for living or kidney as the of for in is evidence of and CKD. The at which be on factors including the and of the and the rate of progression of kidney be between and process of care and comprehensive people with CKD the for and comprehensive comprehensive management as an for people who not to access to that the of care for people with a for care, including those people comprehensive kidney Kidney Disease: Improving Global quality of in full in full in full in a new CKD, kidney Kidney Disease: Improving Global CKD, kidney Kidney Disease: Improving Global CKD, kidney Kidney Disease: Improving Global quality of We with that the and is accepted by the Specifically, we of the between the of CKD, which is inclusive of various of kidney and the that the of the (i.e., filtration rate for the of risk assessment, and The risk of outcomes kidney kidney and is increased for all people with CKD, for are by and other We the between and by individual risk that are different for different populations, and not of CKD, as are for nor that the individual implications of those for by the increasing recognition of the of CKD, and lack of as to the of population for on of kidney the the and a framework for and or and in and to the of the and resource health policy has a to in and risk factors to CKD, to CKD and to delay its progression and evidence-based of people with CKD with together with a systematic review in people with and that for CKD be for kidney a of for a systematic Kidney In and and in the around the world, is a large between CKD and of There is access to kidney with the of and and evidence of sex and gender in access to CKD CKD progression at benefits and the of kidney and systematic review of care models in and that those care or health in GFR as to on care Chronic kidney care models in and a systematic are resource it is to they be for to We that kidney people at different and with different across the a and gender for risk assessment, and is the of the and the diagnostic and to in and In and approaches of specific such as or and gender as well as other important not and important in kidney health and the guideline we as to and gender be and specifically of the chapters population based on glomerular filtration and an are presented as of the to updated risk across CKD on a population The that the of all of CKD is increased with of GFR and and include using both updated for creatinine as well as those using creatinine and cystatin this of key and inclusive we the key statements for of the This the of CKD in populations CKD is and be at The for the diagnosis of CKD in the use of testing methods, and the of evaluation for the and accurate assessment of GFR and urine to people with CKD. There are special considerations in populations and those with and The evaluation of be using all and and testing genetics, and that etiology and of that to of all current CKD or have is in clinicians and people with CKD to the of CKD. The also clinicians that the kidney has and and that GFR is of the methods by which to GFR and to use direct is The recommendations to use the to with a of creatinine and cystatin C, are both a patient and that have limitations that can be with the use of an is and a on accuracy and on resource with the The describes the of using a creatinine and cystatin in specific 2 clinical this or creatinine for of kidney in and and in a Kidney cystatin other than and the on other than glomerular filtration rate cystatin between and cystatin to to GFR in with of with an reference of kidney using and glomerular filtration and in evaluation in with who were to or of glomerular filtration rate in a of using creatinine and cystatin glomerular filtration rate from creatinine and cystatin in with creatinine for GFR in CKD to Kidney creatinine and cystatin of glomerular filtration rate are in in the of for with cystatin for GFR in with Kidney of on glomerular filtration rate for the assessment of kidney in of kidney in with is cystatin a of kidney than as a GFR in and a systematic we knowledge and GFR using cystatin creatinine or are implications of those that to be by clinicians, in both and for use of cystatin clinical of on GFR and in or creatinine for of kidney in of be other than in of be an in is the and and in a Kidney of be in those other in those with with or of be in those other in those with in as a GFR in and a systematic Kidney by or of and to be cystatin other than and the on other than glomerular filtration rate cystatin between and cystatin to to of data, to of or