Development of the PROMOTE model to stratify colorectal cancer risk for prioritization of colonoscopy resource use: a multicenter prospective study

医学 结肠镜检查 优先次序 观察研究 结直肠癌 逻辑回归 前瞻性队列研究 置信区间 风险评估 接收机工作特性 内科学 队列研究 危险分层 梅德林 试验预测值 代理(统计) 急诊医学 优势比 重症监护医学 队列 肿瘤科 风险因素 癌症 回顾性队列研究
作者
Leonardo Frazzoni,Cristiano Spada,Gianpiero Manes,Carlo Fabbri,Marco Di Marco,Alessandro Mussetto,Helga Bertani,Franco Radaelli,Cesare Hassan,Giulio Antonelli,Antonio Facciorusso,Mário Dinis‐Ribeiro,Colin Rees,Lorenzo Fuccio,and the PROMOTE Study Group
出处
期刊:Endoscopy [Thieme Medical Publishers (Germany)]
卷期号:58 (04): 397-406 被引量:1
标识
DOI:10.1055/a-2751-2956
摘要

Colonoscopy efficacy for colorectal cancer (CRC) prevention is limited by inappropriate or over- prescription. Colonoscopy appropriateness prioritization (CAP) criteria have recently been proposed, but their role in CRC risk stratification remains unclear. The study objective was to derive and validate a predictive model for CRC taking account of CAP criteria, and to assess CRC occurrence in the light of appropriateness of colonoscopies.In a prospective observational study across 19 Italian centers, including adults undergoing colonoscopy outside CRC screening programs, three cohorts were analyzed for derivation, temporal validation, and geographic validation of the model. CRC risk was estimated by multivariable logistic regression. Model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC), and two risk groups were defined: low-risk (<5%) and high-risk (≥5%). Number-needed-to-scope (NNS) was calculated.The derivation and temporal and geographic validation, cohorts included 2059, 1321, and 1924 patients, respectively, with CRC prevalence 3.6%, 3.9%, and 3%, respectively. CRC was more frequent in appropriate versus inappropriate colonoscopies. The PROMOTE model included: ages 50-59 (odds ratio [OR] 1.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.64-5.59), 60-69 (OR 3.87, 95%CI 1.40-10.71), and ≥70 (OR 5.35, 95%CI 2.04-14.06), versus <50; no colonoscopy in previous 10 years (OR 2.92, 95%CI 1.62-5.25); according to CAP criteria, deferrable (OR 3.44, 95%CI 1.42-8.34) and urgent (OR 16.12, 95%CI 7.15-36.36) versus nonurgent. Discrimination was good (AUROC 0.84, 95%CI 0.79-0.89). NNS was 8-9 in the high-risk group and 67-71 in the low-risk group across validation cohorts.We developed and validated the PROMOTE model, a simple tool to estimate CRC risk before colonoscopy, to support appropriate referral, optimize prioritization, and improve resource use.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
打打应助花子采纳,获得10
刚刚
Owen应助yangts2021采纳,获得10
刚刚
刚刚
mikaqyan完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
小米完成签到,获得积分0
刚刚
11号迪西馅饼完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
21完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
韶忆秋发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
999完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
ikun完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
潇洒的涵双完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
2秒前
3秒前
Yen发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
ral完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
Crystal完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
5秒前
望着拥有完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
星空发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
Anovel发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
科研张完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
诚心凡白完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
nie完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
淡定天磊完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
默默杨发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
fufu完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
7秒前
柚子完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
远方发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
嘻嘻完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
DDZ完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
chengcheng完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
SciGPT应助科研人采纳,获得10
8秒前
善良书蕾完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
mhWang完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
kenny发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
高分求助中
Markov Chain Monte Carlo 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Common Foundations of American and East Asian Modernisation: From Alexander Hamilton to Junichero Koizumi 5000
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 610
政治传播过程中的外交与说服——以中苏友好协会为例的历史考察 566
Discerning Saints: Moralization of Intrinsic Motivation and Selective Prosociality at Work 500
Handbuch Trainingswissenschaft – Trainingslehre 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7579966
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9159459
关于积分的说明 19594833
捐赠科研通 7162627
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3265784
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2430774
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2256603