反事实思维
基线(sea)
校准
意义(存在)
工作(物理)
心理学
计算机科学
行为经济学
机器学习
人工智能
计量经济学
经济
基础(证据)
决策者
运筹学
数据收集
精算学
期限(时间)
随机试验
不平等
实验经济学
作者
Andrew Caplin,David Deming,Shangwen Li,Daniel Martin,Philip Marx,Ben Weidmann,K. Ye
出处
期刊:Management Science
[Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences]
日期:2025-10-24
标识
DOI:10.1287/mnsc.2024.08994
摘要
We use a controlled experiment to show that ability and belief calibration jointly determine the benefits of working with artificial intelligence (AI). AI improves performance more for people with low baseline ability. However, holding ability constant, AI assistance is more valuable for people who are calibrated, meaning they have accurate beliefs about their own ability. People who know they have low ability gain the most from working with AI. In a counterfactual analysis, we show that eliminating miscalibration would cause AI to reduce performance inequality nearly twice as much as it already does. This paper was accepted by Marie Claire Villeval, behavioral economics and decision analysis. Funding: This work was supported by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation (Cognitive Economics at Work). Supplemental Material: The online appendix and data files are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2024.08994 .
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI