Impact of Local Infiltration Analgesia on the Quality of Recovery After Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Randomized, Triple-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial

医学 罗哌卡因 麻醉 安慰剂 随机对照试验 四分位间距 随机化 患者满意度 围手术期 置信区间 关节置换术 外科 内科学 病理 替代医学
作者
Nicole Tan,Robert Gotmaker,Michael John Barrington
出处
期刊:Anesthesia & Analgesia [Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
卷期号:129 (6): 1715-1722 被引量:18
标识
DOI:10.1213/ane.0000000000004255
摘要

BACKGROUND: Local infiltration analgesia (LIA) is commonly used in anterior total hip arthroplasty (THA) surgery; however, evidence for its efficacy is lacking. We hypothesized that LIA with 0.2% ropivacaine when compared with injection of placebo (0.9% saline) would improve patient quality of recovery on postoperative day (POD) 1, as measured by the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) score. METHODS: Patients scheduled to have a primary unilateral anterior THA with a single surgeon in a tertiary level metropolitan hospital were randomized to receive LIA with either 2.5 mL/kg of 0.2% ropivacaine or 0.9% saline as placebo. Patients and clinical and study personnel were blinded to group allocation. Perioperative care was standardized and this included spinal anesthesia and oral multimodal analgesia. The primary outcome was a multidimensional (pain, physical comfort, physical independence, emotions, and psychological support) patient-reported quality of recovery scale, QoR-15, measured on POD 1. RESULTS: One hundred sixty patients were randomized; 6 patients were withdrawn after randomization and 2 patients had incomplete outcome data. The intention-to-treat analysis included 152 patients. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) QoR-15 score on POD 1 of the ropivacaine group was 119.5 (102-124), compared with the placebo group which had a median (IQR) of 115 (98-126). The median difference of 2 (95% confidence interval [CI], -4 to 7; P = .56) was not statistically or clinically significant. An as-per-protocol sensitivity analysis of 146 patients who received spinal anesthesia without general anesthesia, and the allocated intervention, also showed no evidence of a significant difference between groups. Secondary outcomes (worst pain numerical rating scale at rest and with movement on POD 1, opioid consumption on PODs 1 and 2, mobilization on POD 1, Brief Pain Inventory severity and interference on POD 90, and length of stay) were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: LIA with 0.2% ropivacaine when compared with 0.9% saline as placebo did not improve quality of recovery 1 day after anterior THA.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
大方的冥茗完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
碧蓝香芦发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
哈哈哈完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
双人余完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
正直凡灵的应助被老石采纳,获得50
5秒前
森火完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
NexusExplorer的应助被123采纳,获得10
6秒前
...完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
翊然甜周发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
郭子啊完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
10秒前
黑米完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
落后的嚣完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
华仔的应助被碧蓝香芦采纳,获得10
12秒前
wyuanhu完成签到,获得积分0
12秒前
欢呼傲云完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
野战星完成签到 ,获得积分10
14秒前
杨嘉禧完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
虚幻的香彤完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
我哈哈哈哈哈的应助被予秋采纳,获得10
14秒前
叭叭完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
我要吃饭发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
15秒前
欧阳完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
17秒前
sec1发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
汉堡包的应助被Heguoqing采纳,获得10
19秒前
渺渺完成签到 ,获得积分10
20秒前
123发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
梓辰完成签到 ,获得积分10
21秒前
26秒前
翊然甜周完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
吃葡萄不吐葡萄皮完成签到 ,获得积分10
27秒前
炙热的羽毛完成签到,获得积分10
27秒前
Anne完成签到 ,获得积分10
27秒前
你说什么完成签到,获得积分10
28秒前
Firsterchao的应助被艺骞采纳,获得10
29秒前
29秒前
weijinfen完成签到,获得积分10
30秒前
科研完成签到,获得积分10
30秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Spec 401: Standards for Jet Fuel Facility and Equipment Commissioning and Flushing at Airports, 2026.1 (Original Issue) 1000
Spec 103: Standard for Jet Fuel Quality Control at Airports, Revision 2026.1 1000
Klimaschutzrecht durch den Energiesektor im Mehrebenensystem – Ein Rechtsvergleich 1000
Topological Photonics: Fundamentals and Applications 500
5th World Conference on Detergents: Reinventing the Industry : Opportunities and Challenges 500
Les Mots du discours 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 计算机科学 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 物理 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 人工智能 细胞生物学 无机化学 物理化学 数学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 8097666
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9508250
关于积分的说明 21464525
捐赠科研通 7672382
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3407242
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2535277
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2446786