Ophthalmic adverse drug reactions to systemic drugs: a systematic review

医学 药物反应 梅德林 系统回顾 药物警戒 斯科普斯 不利影响 拉坦前列素 药物不良反应 药品 眼科 皮肤病科 重症监护医学 青光眼 药理学 法学 政治学
作者
Ana Miguel,Filipe Henriques,Luís Filipe Azevedo,Altamiro Costa‐Pereira
出处
期刊:Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety [Wiley]
卷期号:23 (3): 221-233 被引量:28
标识
DOI:10.1002/pds.3566
摘要

ABSTRACT Purpose To perform a comprehensive and systematic review regarding ophthalmic adverse drug reactions (ADRs) to systemic drugs to: (i) systematically summarize existing evidence, (ii) identify areas, ophthalmic ADRs or drugs that lacked systematization or assessment (namely drugs with original studies characterizing specific ophthalmic ADRs but without causality assessment nor without meta‐analysis). Methods Systematic review of several electronic databases (last search 1/7/2012): Medline, SCOPUS, ISI web of knowledge, ISI Conference Proceedings, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts and Google scholar. Search query included: eye, ocular, ophthalmic, ophthalmology, adverse and reaction. Inclusion criteria were: (i) Primary purpose was to assess an ophthalmic ADR to a systemic medication; (ii) Patient evaluation performed by an ophthalmologist; (iii) Studies that specified diagnostic criteria for an ocular ADR. Different types of studies were included and analyzed separately. Two independent reviewers assessed eligibility criteria, extracted data and evaluated risk of bias. Results From 562 studies found, 32 were included (1 systematic review to sildenafil, 11 narrative reviews, 1 trial, 1 prospective study, 6 transversal studies, 6 spontaneous reports and 6 case series). Drugs frequently involved included amiodarone, sildenafil, hydroxychloroquine and biphosphonates. Frequent ophthalmic ADRs included: keratopathy, dry eye and retinopathy. Conclusions To increase evidence about ophthalmic ADRs, there is a need for performing specific systematic reviews, applying strictly the World Health Organization's (WHO) definition of ADR and WHO causality assessment of ADRs. Some ophthalmic ADRs may be frequent, but require ophthalmological examination; therefore, ophthalmologists' education and protocols of collaboration between other specialties whenever they prescribe high‐risk drugs are suggestions for the future. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
平常的路人完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
无花果应助Wed采纳,获得10
1秒前
蓝色的梦发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
Jasper应助qingli采纳,获得10
2秒前
SciGPT应助111111111采纳,获得10
3秒前
Cx330完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
5秒前
张中泽发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
5秒前
6秒前
6秒前
7秒前
无花果应助ZQ采纳,获得10
7秒前
7秒前
淡定凝珍发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
Ztao发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
9秒前
9秒前
9秒前
hulahula发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
朱琼慧发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
所所应助久离采纳,获得10
10秒前
10秒前
感动从寒完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
好好学习完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
11秒前
11秒前
bios8086发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
棕棕完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
十一完成签到,获得积分20
12秒前
12秒前
geoffreyfan发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
shoyo发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
领导范儿应助猫猫叫cat采纳,获得10
13秒前
14秒前
14秒前
ak发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
耍酷的大门应助科研甄嬛采纳,获得10
15秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
HYDROLYSE ACIDE DE QUELQUES DIOXASPIROCYCLANES 1314
Navigating Normative Orders. Interdisciplinary Perspectives 800
Essentials of Carbohydrate Chemistry and Biochemistry, 4th Edition 700
1 Peter and Christ's Descent to the Dead in Its Early Christian Reception 700
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7742965
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9291147
关于积分的说明 20206074
捐赠科研通 7321482
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3307231
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2459126
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2317824