医学
心室
射血分数
顶点(几何体)
心脏病学
心室流出道
内科学
心力衰竭
铅(地质)
解剖
地貌学
地质学
作者
Vladimir Mitov,Zoran Perišić,Aleksandar Jolić,Tomislav Kostić,Aleksandar Aleksić,Željka Aleksić
出处
期刊:Medicinski Pregled
[Serbian Medical Society]
日期:2016-01-01
卷期号:69 (7-8): 212-216
被引量:1
摘要
INTRODUCTION: The study was aimed at assessing the difference between the right ventricle apex versus the right ventricular outflow tract lead position in functional capacity in the patients with the preserved left ventricular ejection fraction after 12 months of pacemaker stimulation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized, follow-up study, which lasted for 12 months. The study sample included 132 consecutive patients who were implanted with permanent anti-bradicardiac pacemaker. Regarding the right ventricular lead position the patients were divided into two groups: the right ventricle apex group consisting of 61 patients with right ventricular apex lead position. The right ventricular outflow tract group included 71 patients with right ventricular outflow tract lead position. Functional capacity was assessed by Minnesota Living With Heart Failure score, New York Heart Association class and Six Minute Walk Test. Left ventricular ejection fraction was assessed by echocardiography. RESULTS: Minnesota Living With Heart Failure score and New York Heart Association class had a statistically significant improvement in both study groups. The patients from right ventricle apex group walked 20.95% (p=O.03) more in comparison to starting values. The patients from right ventricular outflow tract group walked only 13.63% (p=0.09) longer distance than the startingoneConclusion. Analysis of tests of functional status New York Heart Association class and Minnesota Living With Heart Failure questionnaire showed an even improvement in the right ventricle apex and right ventricular outflow tract groups. Analysis of 6 minute walk test showed that only the patients with the preserved left ventricular ejection fraction from the right ventricle apex group had a significant improvement after 12 months of pacemaker stimulation..
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI