Criminal statutes specify the necessary and sufficient conditions under which a conviction may be returned. Frequently, definitions of crimes are difficult for anyone not a lawyer to understand. If we are to take seriously the idea that criminal law is to guide conduct, we should take greater care to ensure that people actually know what is required of them. This chapter is a response to Paul Robinson and Antony Duff concerning their views about a code of conduct for citizens and whether it should include a reference to mental states. It argues that some elements of civil law need to be included in a proper account of the distinction between justification and excuse and a code of advice for citizens, and that the starting point for an account of the relationship between criminal law and citizen should be the rights (especially the human rights) of the citizen, not a conception of the major criminal proscriptions.