亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

A novel method to enhance informed consent: a prospective and randomised trial of form-based versus electronic assisted informed consent in paediatric endoscopy

知情同意 医学 替代医学 医学物理学 家庭医学 医学教育 病理
作者
Joel A. Friedlander,Greg S Loeben,Patricia K Finnegan,Anita Puma,Xuemei Zhang,Edwin F. de Zoeten,David A. Piccoli,Petar Mamula
出处
期刊:Journal of Medical Ethics [BMJ]
卷期号:37 (4): 194-200 被引量:60
标识
DOI:10.1136/jme.2010.037622
摘要

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the adequacy of paediatric informed consent and its augmentation by a supplemental computer-based module in paediatric endoscopy. METHODS: The Consent-20 instrument was developed and piloted on 47 subjects. Subsequently, parents of 101 children undergoing first-time, diagnostic upper endoscopy performed under moderate IV sedation were prospectively and consecutively, blinded, randomised and enrolled into two groups that received either standard form-based informed consent or standard form-based informed consent plus a commercial (Emmi Solutions, Inc, Chicago, Il), sixth grade level, interactive learning module (electronic assisted consent). Anonymously and electronically, the subjects' anxiety (State Trait Anxiety Inventory), satisfaction (Modified Group Health Association of America), number of questions asked, and attainment of informed consent were assessed (Consent-20). Statistics were calculated using t test, paired t test, and Mann Whitney tests. RESULTS: The ability to achieve informed consent, as measured by the new instrument, was 10% in the control form-based consent group and 33% in the electronic assisted consent group (p<0.0001). Electronically assisting form-based informed consent did not alter secondary outcome measures of subject satisfaction, anxiety or number of questions asked in a paediatric endoscopy unit. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the limitations of form-based informed consent methods for paediatric endoscopy. It also shows that even when necessary information was repeated electronically in a comprehensive and standardised video, informed consent as measured by our instrument was incompletely achieved. The supplemental information did, however, significantly improve understanding in a manner that did not negatively impact workflow, subject anxiety or subject satisfaction. Additional study of informed consent is required.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
bruna发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
2025alex完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
15秒前
冷傲的醉山完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
笨笨静白发布了新的文献求助10
26秒前
lili应助tkx是流氓兔采纳,获得10
26秒前
王三金完成签到,获得积分10
33秒前
科研通AI6.4应助笨笨静白采纳,获得10
36秒前
王三金发布了新的文献求助10
37秒前
38秒前
42秒前
李健应助JoeyJin采纳,获得10
43秒前
Jary发布了新的文献求助10
47秒前
健康的斑马完成签到,获得积分20
51秒前
风趣的雨莲完成签到,获得积分10
53秒前
小巧的傲晴完成签到,获得积分10
56秒前
欣欣发布了新的文献求助10
56秒前
tkx是流氓兔完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
思源应助wsnssbnhbx1采纳,获得10
1分钟前
丘比特应助桃子采纳,获得10
1分钟前
1分钟前
淡定溪灵完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
wsnssbnhbx1发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
明理汲完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
leilani发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
洋汐发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
姜小白发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
1分钟前
大个应助Snow886采纳,获得10
1分钟前
HY完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
桃子完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
zhangjing发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
1分钟前
leilani完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
zcc111完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
八点半到北京完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Essentials of Carbohydrate Chemistry and Biochemistry, 4th Edition 800
Navigating Normative Orders. Interdisciplinary Perspectives 800
1 Peter and Christ's Descent to the Dead in Its Early Christian Reception 700
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7749790
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9297533
关于积分的说明 20240651
捐赠科研通 7331159
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3309381
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2460916
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2321673