心理学
耐受性
精神分裂症(面向对象编程)
认知
临床心理学
心理测量学
可靠性(半导体)
精神科
医学
量子力学
物理
病理
功率(物理)
替代医学
作者
L. Felice Reddy,William P. Horan,Deanna M. Barch,Robert W. Buchanan,Eduardo Dunayevich,James M. Gold,Naomi Lyons,Stephen R. Marder,Michael T. Treadway,Jonathan K. Wynn,Jared W. Young,Michael F. Green
标识
DOI:10.1093/schbul/sbv089
摘要
Impairments in willingness to exert effort contribute to the motivational deficits characteristic of the negative symptoms of schizophrenia. The current study evaluated the psychometric properties of 5 new or adapted paradigms to determine their suitability for use in clinical trials of schizophrenia. This study included 94 clinically stable participants with schizophrenia and 40 healthy controls. The effort-based decision-making battery was administered twice to the schizophrenia group (baseline, 4-week retest) and once to the control group. The 5 paradigms included 1 that assesses cognitive effort, 1 perceptual effort, and 3 that assess physical effort. Each paradigm was evaluated on (1) patient vs healthy control group differences, (2) test-retest reliability, (3) utility as a repeated measure (ie, practice effects), and (4) tolerability. The 5 paradigms showed varying psychometric strengths and weaknesses. The Effort Expenditure for Rewards Task showed the best reliability and utility as a repeated measure, while the Grip Effort Task had significant patient-control group differences, and superior tolerability and administration duration. The other paradigms showed weaker psychometric characteristics in their current forms. These findings highlight challenges in adapting effort and motivation paradigms for use in clinical trials.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI