Glofitamab Plus R-CHOP Induces High Response Rates and a Favorable Safety Profile in Patients with Previously Untreated Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL): Results from a Phase Ib Study

Background: R-CHOP is a standard treatment for previously untreated DLBCL, however, more than one-third of patients are not cured by R-CHOP and there is a clear need for more effective novel first-line treatment combinations. Glofitamab is a CD20xCD3 T-cell-engaging bispecific monoclonal antibody with a novel 2:1 (CD20:CD3) configuration that confers high-avidity bivalent binding to CD20 on B cells (unlike the 1:1 format of conventional bispecific antibodies, which confers monovalent binding to CD20); this bivalency for CD20 enables combination with anti-CD20 antibodies, including rituximab. Glofitamab has shown high activity as a single agent in patients with heavily pretreated and/or highly refractory DLBCL (Dickinson et al. ASCO 2022). Preliminary findings from the safety run-in phase of the ongoing NP40126 study (NCT03467373) demonstrated tolerable safety with glofitamab (Glofit) + R-CHOP as first-line therapy for patients with DLBCL (Ghosh et al. ASH 2021); here, we present efficacy and safety data from both the safety run-in portion and the expansion stage of this study. Methods: Patients received R-CHOP in Cycle (C)1 with the aim of tumor debulking to mitigate cytokine release syndrome (CRS) risk. In total, 6-8 21-day cycles of R-CHOP were administered. Intravenous glofitamab was given during C2 (Day [D]8, 2.5mg; D15, 10mg) and at the target dose (30mg) from C3D8 onwards (21-day cycles). Hospitalization was at the discretion of the investigator for those patients enrolled in the expansion stage. Response was assessed by PET-CT using Lugano criteria (Cheson et al. J Clin Oncol 2014). Patients who were scheduled to reach end of treatment (EOT) by the data cut-off were considered efficacy-evaluable (EOT population). CRS events were graded using ASTCT criteria (Lee et al. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2019). Other adverse events (AEs) were graded using CTCAE. Results: At data cut-off (May 25, 2022), 56 patients were enrolled (safety population); of these, 46 had reached their scheduled EOT assessment (EOT population). Two patients in the EOT population were withdrawn from the study prior to receiving glofitamab (Grade [Gr] 5 infusion-related reaction [IRR] related to rituximab at C1D1; Gr 4 thrombosis following R-CHOP); the total number of patients exposed to glofitamab 30mg + R-CHOP was 44. Median age was 68 years (range: 21-84) and 54 pts (96.4%) had Ann Arbor Stage III/IV disease. In the EOT population, median IPI score was 3 (IPI 1: 2.2% [1/46], IPI 2: 30.4% [14/46], IPI 3: 34.8% [16/46], IPI 4: n= 28.3 [13/46], IPI 5: n= 4.3% [2/46]). After a median 5.6 (range: 5.1-10.3) months follow up, the complete metabolic response rate was 76.1% (35/46) and the overall response rate was 93.5% (43/46) in the EOT population (BOR). Of 56 patients in the safety population, Gr ≥3 AEs occurred in 40 (71.4%) patients and Gr ≥3 AEs related to glofitamab in 13 (23.2%) patients. Serious AEs (SAEs) were reported in 18 (32.1%) patients and SAEs related to glofitamab in five (8.9%) patients. Gr 5 AEs were reported in three (5.4%) patients (COVID-19 pneumonia, n=2; IRR to rituximab, n=1). AEs leading to dose modification/interruption of glofitamab occurred in 11 (19.6%) patients, including COVID-19 pneumonia (n=3) and COVID-19 (n=2). Median dose intensity was 100% for all R-CHOP components. One AE leading to discontinuation of glofitamab was reported (cerebrovascular accident, considered unrelated to glofitamab). There were no severe Gr 3-5 CRS events and Gr 1-2 CRS was reported in six (10.7%) patients: Gr 1, n=4; Gr 2, n=2. All CRS events occurred during C2-3 and were resolved. Neurologic AEs (NAEs) occurred in 22 (39.3%) patients (of which the majority were Gr ≤2 [20/22]); Gr 3 NAEs included cerebrovascular accident (n=1) and herpes zoster (n=1). No glofitamab-related NAEs potentially consistent with immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome were reported. Neutropenia was reported in 27 (48.2%) patients (Gr ≥3 neutropenia: Gr 3, n=6; Gr 4, n=19) and serious infection in nine (16.1%) patients. Conclusions: The low incidence and severity of CRS, minimal toxicity and promising efficacy reported in this analysis suggest that glofitamab can be safely combined with R-CHOP as a fixed-duration treatment for patients with first-line DLBCL. The dose intensity of R-CHOP was maintained in all patients. Glofit + R-CHOP may be suitable for the outpatient setting. Figure 1View largeDownload PPTFigure 1View largeDownload PPT Close modal