2016 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism Criteria for Minimal, Moderate, and Major Clinical Response in Adult Dermatomyositis and Polymyositis: An International Myositis Assessment and Clinical Studies Group/Paediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organisation Collaborative Initiative

多发性肌炎 医学 痹症科 皮肌炎 风湿病 物理疗法 肌炎 芯(光纤) 包涵体肌炎 内科学 联合分析 成对比较 临床试验 集合(抽象数据类型) 青少年皮肌炎 梅德林 联盟 逻辑回归 物理医学与康复 医学物理学 随机对照试验
作者
Rohit Aggarwal,Lisa G. Rider,Nicolino Ruperto,Nastaran Bayat,Brian Erman,Brian M. Feldman,Chester V. Oddis,Anthony A. Amato,Hector Chinoy,Robert G. Cooper,Maryam Dastmalchi,David Fiorentino,David Isenberg,James D. Katz,Andrew L. Mammen,Marjolein Visser,Steven R. Ytterberg,Ingrid E. Lundberg,Leland W.K. Chung,Katalin Dankó
出处
期刊:Arthritis & rheumatology [Wiley]
卷期号:69 (5): 898-910 被引量:85
标识
DOI:10.1002/art.40064
摘要

Objective To develop response criteria for adult dermatomyositis (DM) and polymyositis (PM). Methods Expert surveys, logistic regression, and conjoint analysis were used to develop 287 definitions using core set measures. Myositis experts rated greater improvement among multiple pairwise scenarios in conjoint analysis surveys, where different levels of improvement in 2 core set measures were presented. The PAPRIKA (Potentially All Pairwise Rankings of All Possible Alternatives) method determined the relative weights of core set measures and conjoint analysis definitions. The performance characteristics of the definitions were evaluated on patient profiles using expert consensus (gold standard) and were validated using data from a clinical trial. The nominal group technique was used to reach consensus. Results Consensus was reached for a conjoint analysis–based continuous model using absolute percent change in core set measures (physician, patient, and extramuscular global activity, muscle strength, Health Assessment Questionnaire, and muscle enzyme levels). A total improvement score (range 0–100), determined by summing scores for each core set measure, was based on improvement in and relative weight of each core set measure. Thresholds for minimal, moderate, and major improvement were ≥20, ≥40, and ≥60 points in the total improvement score. The same criteria were chosen for juvenile DM, with different improvement thresholds. Sensitivity and specificity in DM/PM patient cohorts were 85% and 92%, 90% and 96%, and 92% and 98% for minimal, moderate, and major improvement, respectively. Definitions were validated in the clinical trial analysis for differentiating the physician rating of improvement ( P < 0.001). Conclusion The response criteria for adult DM/PM consisted of the conjoint analysis model based on absolute percent change in 6 core set measures, with thresholds for minimal, moderate, and major improvement.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
王瑶发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
小鹿在努力完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
脑洞疼应助朴素的山蝶采纳,获得50
1秒前
wanglaaaa完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
Akim应助自觉思萱采纳,获得10
2秒前
Hello应助qiu采纳,获得10
2秒前
obu_085801完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
半夏紫苏完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
12发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
欢呼采文发布了新的文献求助30
4秒前
呼啦呼啦完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
负责的紫安完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
7秒前
7秒前
在水一方应助王瑶采纳,获得10
8秒前
9秒前
10秒前
dfdvv发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
友好寻真完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
tzl完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
14秒前
14秒前
樱小露完成签到 ,获得积分10
14秒前
16秒前
雨季不再来完成签到 ,获得积分10
17秒前
香蕉觅云应助吴大王采纳,获得10
17秒前
17秒前
GDMU完成签到 ,获得积分10
18秒前
past完成签到 ,获得积分10
18秒前
丘比特应助Crackpot采纳,获得20
18秒前
20秒前
Fiona发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
21秒前
倩倩子发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
半枝山栀发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
英俊的铭应助年轻南烟采纳,获得10
22秒前
希望天下0贩的0应助某某采纳,获得10
23秒前
芹菜完成签到 ,获得积分10
23秒前
23秒前
23秒前
高分求助中
液晶指向矢仿真分析数据集 8888
GL 2 A method for assessing the in-place cleanability of food processing equipment, Fourth Edition, December 2023 3000
Invited Discussant 63O and 64O 1000
Ideology and Meaning-Making under the Putin Regime 750
Advanced Memory Technology 500
Petrology and Plate Tectonics 500
Writing Systems 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 计算机科学 化学工程 生物化学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 光电子学 物理化学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 遗传学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6863996
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8566845
关于积分的说明 18216225
捐赠科研通 6232120
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3048612
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2049951
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2026350