Comparison of the catheter ablation outcome in patients between targeting the entrance and exit of the reentry circuit in verapamil-sensitive atrial tachycardia originating from the atrioventricular-node vicinity

Verapamil-sensitive atrial tachycardia originating from the atrioventricular node vicinity (AVN-AT) can be eliminated with radiofrequency energy (RF) deliveries targeting either the entrance or exit of its reentry circuit. However, the outcome of these different approaches has not been clarified well. Thus, we compared the catheter ablation outcome targeting the entrance of reentry circuit, identified by the entrainment method (Ent-Group; 21 patients) with that targeting the earliest atrial activation site (EAAS) during AT (Exit-Group; 16 patients). There was no significant difference in the tachycardia cycle length (441.4 ± 87.4 vs. 392.8 ± 64.8 ms, p = 0.0704) or distance from the His bundle (HB) site to the EAAS (6.5 ± 2.0 vs. 7.6 ± 1.8 mm, p = 0.0822) between the Ent- and Exit-Groups. However, distance from the successful ablation site to the HB site in the Ent-Group was significantly longer than that in the Exit-Group (13.4 ± 3.1 vs. 7.6 ± 1.8 mm, p < 0.0001), resulting in more frequent transient atrioventricular block episodes in the Exit-Group than Ent-Group (31.3 vs. 0%, p < 0.01). Initial ATs (AT1s) were terminated in all patients in both Groups. However, ATs accompanied by shifting in the EAAS (AT2) were induced more frequently in the Exit-Group than Ent-Group (50.0 vs. 14.3%, p < 0.02) after eliminating AT1. RF deliveries to the EAAS eliminated all AT2s. The number of RF deliveries was greater in the Exit-Group than Ent-Group (6.9 ± 3.3 vs. 3.9 ± 1.6, p < 0.001). In conclusion, RF ablation targeting the entrance sites can avoid AVN injury and is superior in reducing the number of RF deliveries and occurrence of different ATs than targeting the exit sites in the AVN-AT.