弹性(材料科学)
范围(计算机科学)
风险分析(工程)
利益相关者
计算机科学
风险管理
过程管理
风险评估
管理科学
业务
工程类
计算机安全
热力学
物理
公共关系
程序设计语言
政治学
财务
作者
Igor Linkov,Cate Fox‐Lent,Laura Read,Craig R. Allen,James Arnott,Emanuele Bellini,Jon Coaffee,Marie‐Valentine Florin,Kirk Hatfield,Iain Hyde,William Hynes,Aleksandar Jovanović,Roger E. Kasperson,John Katzenberger,Patrick Keys,James H. Lambert,Richard H. Moss,Peter S. Murdoch,José Manuel Palma‐Oliveira,Roger S. Pulwarty
出处
期刊:Risk Analysis
[Wiley]
日期:2018-04-25
卷期号:38 (9): 1772-1780
被引量:128
摘要
Abstract Regulatory agencies have long adopted a three‐tier framework for risk assessment. We build on this structure to propose a tiered approach for resilience assessment that can be integrated into the existing regulatory processes. Comprehensive approaches to assessing resilience at appropriate and operational scales, reconciling analytical complexity as needed with stakeholder needs and resources available, and ultimately creating actionable recommendations to enhance resilience are still lacking. Our proposed framework consists of tiers by which analysts can select resilience assessment and decision support tools to inform associated management actions relative to the scope and urgency of the risk and the capacity of resource managers to improve system resilience. The resilience management framework proposed is not intended to supplant either risk management or the many existing efforts of resilience quantification method development, but instead provide a guide to selecting tools that are appropriate for the given analytic need. The goal of this tiered approach is to intentionally parallel the tiered approach used in regulatory contexts so that resilience assessment might be more easily and quickly integrated into existing structures and with existing policies.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI