Collaborative Decision-Making in Human-AI Versus Human-Human Teams: The Influence of Information Inquiry and Team Performance Expectations on Team Processes and Outcomes

任务(项目管理) 知识管理 团队效能 团队构成 过程(计算) 探索性研究 信息共享 心理安全 心理学 动力学(音乐) 计算机科学 信息系统 团队学习 应用心理学 任务分析 信息技术 团队合作 信息搜寻
作者
Sophie Kerstan,Gudela Grote,Jan B. Schmutz
出处
期刊:Human Factors [SAGE Publishing]
卷期号:: 187208261477411-187208261477411
标识
DOI:10.1177/00187208261477411
摘要

Objective We investigate whether decision-making processes in human-AI teams mirror those in human-only teams in a task where team members hold common and unique information. Specifically, we examine how information inquiry and performance expectations influence these processes. Background Human-AI decision-making has traditionally been studied as a linear, segmented process where AI provides recommendations and humans make final decisions. However, recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) enable increasingly dynamic interactions similar to the collaborative processes in human-only teams, where members have to share and integrate unique information to reach decisions. Despite the potential for similar dynamics in human-AI teams, research on such configurations—particularly on when unique information is shared—remains limited. Method We conducted an experiment using a hidden profile task, a well-established paradigm in team research. We manipulated team type ( N human-AI = 98; N human-only = 65, three-member teams) and information inquiry, and created conditions with differing performance expectations. Results Information inquiry enhanced information sharing and, consequently, improved decision-making performance, irrespective of performance expectations and team type. Exploratory analyses suggested that while this effect was consistent across team types, information inquiry patterns may differ. Conclusion Our findings prompt avenues for future research on how humans’ communication norms vary when interacting with AI versus human team members. Methodologically, this study demonstrates how established decision-making paradigms can be adapted to incorporate AI, offering insights into both human-only and human-AI team processes. Application The results have practical implications for designing AI systems that promote effective team decision-making by engaging in information inquiry.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
茶叙汤言完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
去看海完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
2秒前
2秒前
2秒前
虎头怪发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
tangke发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
tat完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
5322的应助被等待的风华采纳,获得10
4秒前
Seameng发布了新的文献求助30
5秒前
123654完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
kpp发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
Owen的应助被背后夜柳采纳,获得10
6秒前
6秒前
懒风完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
华仔的应助被开放的钻石采纳,获得10
8秒前
科研星发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
jj发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
Brightfuture完成签到,获得积分20
8秒前
9秒前
尊敬的安露完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
ucas完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
Garrett完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
拼搏的路灯完成签到,获得积分20
11秒前
电灯胆完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
12秒前
12秒前
cristin发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
SciGPT的应助被qian采纳,获得10
13秒前
BASS完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
sc30完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
14秒前
ding的应助被small采纳,获得30
14秒前
14秒前
14秒前
芝麻糊发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
dawnfu完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
Garrett完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
读研好难发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Campbell's Operative Orthopaedics, E-Book 3000
Les Mantodea De Guyane 2000
Energie-Contracting 1500
内視鏡下経鼻経蝶形骨洞手術術後SIADHに対する予防的水制限の安全性と有効性の検討 1000
Guidelines for fracture-safe and fatigue-reliable design of steel structures 600
Problems and Solutions for Integer and Combinatorial Optimization: Building Skills in Discrete Optimization 600
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 计算机科学 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 物理 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 人工智能 细胞生物学 无机化学 物理化学 数学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 8016942
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9462627
关于积分的说明 21194526
捐赠科研通 7587841
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3385509
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2518212
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2420642