二甲双胍
医学
多囊卵巢
无排卵
荟萃分析
不育
随机对照试验
妇科
内科学
梅德林
怀孕
胰岛素
胰岛素抵抗
法学
生物
遗传学
政治学
作者
Stefano Palomba,Renato Pasquali,Francesco Orio,John E. Nestler
标识
DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2265.2008.03369.x
摘要
Summary Background To date, no systematic review or meta‐analysis has been published of direct head‐to‐head studies comparing clomiphene citrate (CC) vs. metformin, or the combination of both drugs as first‐line therapy in anovulatory polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) patients seeking pregnancy. The aim of the current paper was to define, if possible, the best evidence‐based recommendations regarding the use of CC and/or metformin as the initial treatment of PCOS women with anovulatory infertility. Design Systematic review and meta‐analysis of the head‐to‐head randomized controlled trials (RCTs) available in the literature. Methods A bibliographic search was performed using the following bibliographic databases: Medline, EMBASE, Biological Abstracts, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Reference lists of included studies, other relevant review articles and textbooks were checked for additional citations of interest. Results Four head‐to‐head RCTs were identified and qualified for inclusion in the analysis. No difference in fertility improvement was observed comparing CC with metformin (O R = 1·22, 95% CI 0·23–6·55, P = 0·815), whereas a significant ( P < 0·0001) heterogeneity was observed. Homogeneous data showed no difference in fertility improvement between the combination treatment and CC monotherapy (O R = 0·99, 95% CI 0·70–1·40, P = 0·982), but a significant difference in comparison with metformin monotherapy (O R = 0·23, 95% CI 0·14–0·37, P < 0·0001). Conclusions In PCOS patients with anovulatory infertility and not previously treated, the administration of metformin plus CC is not better than monotherapy (metformin alone or CC alone), whereas to date no specific recommendation can be given regarding the use of CC or metformin as first‐step drug.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI