Effect of the amount of correction on posterior tibial slope and patellar height in open-wedge high tibial osteotomy

Objectives: To evaluate the effect of amount of correction on postoperative changes in PTS (posterior tibial slope), PH (patellar height), and clinical outcomes following biplanar OWHTO (open-wedge high tibial osteotomy). Method: This study included 79 knees (32 left and 47 right) of 79 patients (mean age 60.28 ± 4.2 years, 24 males, 55 females) with varus malalignment and symptomatic isolated medial joint osteoarthritis who underwent OWHTO. According to the amount of correction angles, all patients were divided into three groups: LCA (large correction angle) group (>14°), MCA (medium correction angle) group (10°-14°), and SCA (small correction angle) group (<10°). All patients were clinically assessed according to the Lysholm score, HSS (hospital for special surgery knee score), and KSS (knee society score) prior to and after surgery. For radiographic analysis, we measured the PTS, PH [ISI (Insall-Salvati index), and BPI (Blackburne-Peel index)]. The pre-post difference of PTS, ISI, and BPI was calculated by subtracting the post-OWHTO value to the pre-OWHTO value in three groups, respectively. The preoperative, postoperative, and difference of PTS, ISI, and BPI values were analyzed according to the correction angle. The mean follow-up period was 28.5 months (SD, 4.9; range 18-52 months). Results: Radiologically, PTS increased and PH decreased after surgery on the whole (p < .05). The relationship between amount of correction and slope increase is significant (p < .001). Furthermore, the pairwise difference between the LCA group and SCA group and MCA group is significant respectively (p < .05). In terms of PH, the LCA group yielded ISI and BPI that were significantly different from baseline for the SCA group and MCA group. In addition, the pairwise difference between the SCA group and LCA group in ISI and BPI is significant (p = .031). Clinically, significant improvements were observed in postoperative clinical scores of the Lysholm score, HSS, and KSS (p < .05). Seventy-four patients (93.67%) reported satisfaction with surgery. However, no correlation was found between changes in PTS and PH with postoperative knee score. No severe adverse complications were observed. Conclusions: The amount of correction angle is a significant factor affecting the PTS and PH in OWHTO. With increased correction angle, the likelihood of increasing the PTS and decreasing the PH increases. Special attention should be paid to keep PTS and PH unchanged in cases where large corrections are required. Otherwise, closing wedge osteotomy or other intraoperative effective measures are supposed to be adopted.