Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy for Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

医学 糖尿病足 体外冲击波疗法 梅德林 科克伦图书馆 置信区间 糖尿病 优势比 糖尿病足溃疡 荟萃分析 截肢 临床试验 伤口护理 随机对照试验 相对风险 系统回顾 奇纳 内科学 外科 心理干预 法学 政治学 内分泌学 精神科
作者
Louise Hitchman,Joshua Totty,Ali Raza,Paris Cai,George Smith,Daniel Carradice,Tom Wallace,Amy E. Harwood,Ian Chetter
出处
期刊:Annals of Vascular Surgery [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:56: 330-339 被引量:34
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.avsg.2018.10.013
摘要

Background Diabetes mellitus is one of the most common chronic diseases worldwide. Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) occur in over 10% of diabetic patients and are associated with high morbidity. Clinical trials have shown benefit from extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) in a DFU healing. This systematic review aims to assess the currently available evidence examining the efficacy of ESWT on healing of DFU. Methods Electronic databases including PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, Web of Science, Embase, CINAHL Plus, Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials, and Clinical Trials Registry were searched up to November 2017 for terms related to ESWT in DFU. Articles were identified, and data were extracted by 2 independent reviewers onto Review Manager 5.3 software. Results This review included 5 trials of 255 patients published between 2009 and 2016. Three studies compared ESWT to standard wound care, and 2 studies compared ESWT to hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT). All studies contained unclear to high risk of bias assessed by the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. ESWT was superior to standard wound care at complete wound healing (odds ratio [OR] 2.66 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03, 6.87, I2 0%) and time to healing (64.5 ± 8.06 days versus 81.17 ± 4.35 days). DFU healing improved more with ESWT than HBOT (OR 2.45 95% CI 1.07, 5.61 I2 28%). There was variable evidence of effect on the blood flow perfusion rate. Infection rate and amputation rate were not reported. Conclusions This systematic review concludes that ESWT has the potential to improve healing in DFUs, although there is, as yet, insufficient evidence to justify its use in routine clinical practice. The meta-analysis has a high risk of bias and is unlikely to reflect true effect size because of problematic risk of bias in included studies. This review highlights the variable quality of methodology of trials and dosing of shockwave therapy and the need for robust adequately powered research into this promising therapy. Diabetes mellitus is one of the most common chronic diseases worldwide. Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) occur in over 10% of diabetic patients and are associated with high morbidity. Clinical trials have shown benefit from extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) in a DFU healing. This systematic review aims to assess the currently available evidence examining the efficacy of ESWT on healing of DFU. Electronic databases including PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, Web of Science, Embase, CINAHL Plus, Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials, and Clinical Trials Registry were searched up to November 2017 for terms related to ESWT in DFU. Articles were identified, and data were extracted by 2 independent reviewers onto Review Manager 5.3 software. This review included 5 trials of 255 patients published between 2009 and 2016. Three studies compared ESWT to standard wound care, and 2 studies compared ESWT to hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT). All studies contained unclear to high risk of bias assessed by the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. ESWT was superior to standard wound care at complete wound healing (odds ratio [OR] 2.66 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03, 6.87, I2 0%) and time to healing (64.5 ± 8.06 days versus 81.17 ± 4.35 days). DFU healing improved more with ESWT than HBOT (OR 2.45 95% CI 1.07, 5.61 I2 28%). There was variable evidence of effect on the blood flow perfusion rate. Infection rate and amputation rate were not reported. This systematic review concludes that ESWT has the potential to improve healing in DFUs, although there is, as yet, insufficient evidence to justify its use in routine clinical practice. The meta-analysis has a high risk of bias and is unlikely to reflect true effect size because of problematic risk of bias in included studies. This review highlights the variable quality of methodology of trials and dosing of shockwave therapy and the need for robust adequately powered research into this promising therapy.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
潇洒的血茗完成签到 ,获得积分10
刚刚
丰富的晓山完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
枫楠完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
科研骏马完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
济南清朝老兵完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
加选完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
晨晨完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
小小完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
雪山飞龙发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
田様应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
15秒前
cdercder应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
15秒前
张欢馨应助飞云采纳,获得10
15秒前
sagitar应助科研通管家采纳,获得20
15秒前
15秒前
cdercder应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
15秒前
molihuakai应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
16秒前
fengwei应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
16秒前
张欢馨应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
16秒前
star完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
cdercder应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
16秒前
Kao应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
16秒前
负数完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
唯梦完成签到 ,获得积分10
19秒前
萱棚完成签到 ,获得积分10
19秒前
wweq完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
23秒前
Xiaopig发布了新的文献求助10
27秒前
雪山飞龙发布了新的文献求助10
28秒前
jetlee完成签到 ,获得积分10
28秒前
腼腆的山兰完成签到 ,获得积分10
29秒前
立青完成签到,获得积分10
29秒前
万千回忆完成签到,获得积分10
29秒前
30秒前
温暖的蚂蚁完成签到 ,获得积分10
30秒前
酷波er应助郝晓东采纳,获得10
32秒前
儒雅曼岚完成签到,获得积分10
32秒前
打打应助Xiaopig采纳,获得10
33秒前
ZeSheng完成签到,获得积分10
35秒前
小刘发布了新的文献求助10
36秒前
Freedom完成签到 ,获得积分10
38秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
China Pluperfect I: Epistemology of Past and Outside in Chinese Art 520
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
Cosmos as Art Object: Studies in Plato's Timaeus and Other Dialogues 500
What is the Future of Psychotherapy in Digital Age? Technology, AI Bots, and Psychotherapy after Covid 444
Management and the Arts 310
Teaching Social and Emotional Learning in Physical Education 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7634461
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9208519
关于积分的说明 19748527
捐赠科研通 7202624
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3275054
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2436953
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2271959