医学
无线电技术
子宫内膜癌
淋巴血管侵犯
荟萃分析
肿瘤科
系统回顾
内科学
梅德林
放射科
癌症
转移
法学
政治学
作者
Junmei He,Yurong Liu,Jinzhu Li,Shuang Liu
标识
DOI:10.3389/fonc.2024.1334546
摘要
Background With the increasing use of radiomics in cancer diagnosis and treatment, it has been applied by some researchers to the preoperative risk assessment of endometrial cancer (EC) patients. However, comprehensive and systematic evidence is needed to assess its clinical value. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the application value of radiomics in the diagnosis and treatment of EC. Methods Pubmed, Cochrane, Embase, and Web of Science databases were retrieved up to March 2023. Preoperative risk assessment of EC included high-grade EC, lymph node metastasis, deep myometrial invasion status, and lymphovascular space invasion status. The quality of the included studies was appraised utilizing the RQS scale. Results A total of 33 primary studies were included in our systematic review, with an average RQS score of 7 (range: 5–12). ML models based on radiomics for the diagnosis of malignant lesions predominantly employed logistic regression. In the validation set, the pooled c-index of the ML models based on radiomics and clinical features for the preoperative diagnosis of endometrial malignancy, high-grade tumors, lymph node metastasis, lymphovascular space invasion, and deep myometrial invasion was 0.900 (95%CI: 0.871–0.929), 0.901 (95%CI: 0.877–0.926), 0.906 (95%CI: 0.882–0.929), 0.795 (95%CI: 0.693–0.897), and 0.819 (95%CI: 0.705–0.933), respectively. Conclusions Radiomics shows excellent accuracy in detecting endometrial malignancies and in identifying preoperative risk. However, the methodological diversity of radiomics results in significant heterogeneity among studies. Therefore, future research should establish guidelines for radiomics studies based on different imaging sources. Systematic review registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=364320 identifier CRD42022364320.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI