标枪
阿维鲁单抗
医学
尿路上皮癌
中期分析
临时的
肿瘤科
内科学
泌尿科
一线治疗
转移性尿路上皮癌
尿路上皮癌
膀胱癌
化疗
免疫疗法
癌症
临床试验
彭布罗利珠单抗
投掷
考古
工程类
历史
机械工程
作者
Jean Hoffman‐Censits,Marinos Tsiatas,Peter Mu‐Hsin Chang,Minu Kim,L. Antonuzzo,Su‐Jin Shin,Georgios Gakis,Normand Blais,Sung Hoon Kim,Angela B. Smith,Jóse Ángel Arranz Arija,Yu‐Li Su,Flora Zagouri,M. Maruzzo,Christophe Tournigand,Frédéric Forget,A. Schneider,Karin Tyroller,N. Jacob,P. Grivas
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.annonc.2025.05.010
摘要
Avelumab first-line maintenance is a recommended treatment option for patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC) without progression following platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC). The JAVELIN Bladder Medley phase II trial is investigating the efficacy and safety of maintenance treatment with avelumab combined with other antitumor agents versus avelumab monotherapy. We report an interim analysis of avelumab plus sacituzumab govitecan (SG) versus avelumab monotherapy. Patients with la/mUC without progression after first-line PBC were randomized 2 : 1 to receive avelumab (800 mg every 2 weeks) plus SG (10 mg/kg on days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles) or avelumab monotherapy (800 mg every 2 weeks). Primary endpoints are investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) and safety. For PFS and overall survival (OS), data in the avelumab monotherapy arm were extended per protocol using propensity score-weighted JAVELIN Bladder 100 data. At data cut-off (16 September 2024), 38/74 patients (51.4%) in the avelumab plus SG arm and 10/37 patients (27.0%) in the avelumab monotherapy arm were still receiving study treatment. Median PFS with avelumab plus SG versus avelumab monotherapy was 11.17 versus 3.75 months, respectively [hazard ratio (HR) 0.49, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.31-0.76; prespecified efficacy boundary: HR ≤ 0.60]. OS data were immature; median OS was not reached versus 23.75 months, respectively (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.42-1.50). In patients treated with avelumab plus SG or avelumab monotherapy, any-grade treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 97.3% versus 63.9% (grade ≥3 in 69.9% versus 0%), respectively. In patients with la/mUC without progression after first-line PBC, PFS was prolonged with avelumab plus SG versus avelumab monotherapy as maintenance treatment. TRAEs were more frequent with the combination and were consistent with known safety profiles of SG and avelumab. Combining avelumab with anti-Trop-2 antibody-drug conjugates may be a promising strategy to improve patient outcomes in la/mUC.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI