医学
重症监护医学
协商一致会议
危重病
动员
病危
医疗急救
内科学
历史
考古
作者
Carol Hodgson,Kathy Stiller,Dale M. Needham,Claire J. Tipping,Meg Harrold,Claire Baldwin,Scott Bradley,Sue Berney,L. Caruana,Doug Elliott,Margot Green,Kimberley J. Haines,Alisa M. Higgins,Kirsi‐Maija Kaukonen,I. Anne Leditschke,Marc Nickels,Jennifer Paratz,Shane Patman,Elizabeth H. Skinner,Paul J. Young
出处
期刊:Critical Care
[BioMed Central]
日期:2014-12-04
卷期号:18 (6)
被引量:528
标识
DOI:10.1186/s13054-014-0658-y
摘要
Abstract Introduction The aim of this study was to develop consensus recommendations on safety parameters for mobilizing adult, mechanically ventilated, intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Methods A systematic literature review was followed by a meeting of 23 multidisciplinary ICU experts to seek consensus regarding the safe mobilization of mechanically ventilated patients. Results Safety considerations were summarized in four categories: respiratory, cardiovascular, neurological and other. Consensus was achieved on all criteria for safe mobilization, with the exception being levels of vasoactive agents. Intubation via an endotracheal tube was not a contraindication to early mobilization and a fraction of inspired oxygen less than 0.6 with a percutaneous oxygen saturation more than 90% and a respiratory rate less than 30 breaths/minute were considered safe criteria for in- and out-of-bed mobilization if there were no other contraindications. At an international meeting, 94 multidisciplinary ICU clinicians concurred with the proposed recommendations. Conclusion Consensus recommendations regarding safety criteria for mobilization of adult, mechanically ventilated patients in the ICU have the potential to guide ICU rehabilitation whilst minimizing the risk of adverse events.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI