神经反射
随机对照试验
致盲
心理学
听力学
临床心理学
物理疗法
医学
精神科
脑电图
内科学
作者
L. Eugene Arnold,Nicholas Lofthouse,Sarah Hersch,Xueliang Jeff Pan,Elizabeth A. Hurt,Bethany Bates,Kathleen M. Kassouf,Stacey Moone,Cara Grantier
标识
DOI:10.1177/1087054712446173
摘要
OBJECTIVE: Preparing for a definitive randomized clinical trial (RCT) of neurofeedback (NF) for ADHD, this pilot trial explored feasibility of a double-blind, sham-controlled design and adherence/palatability/relative effect of two versus three treatments/week. METHOD: Unmedicated 6- to 12-year-olds with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed.; DSM-IV) ADHD were randomized to active NF versus sham-NF and to 2X versus 3X/week treatment frequency. Frequency switch was allowed after Treatment 24. RESULTS: In two school years, 39 participants were recruited and 34 (87%) completed all 40 treatments. Child/parent guesses about assigned treatment were no better than chance. At Treatment 24, 38% chose 2X/week and 62% chose 3X/week. Both active NF and sham yielded large pre-post improvement on parent ratings but NF no more than sham. CONCLUSION: Blinding appears to work, and sham does not prevent recruitment/retention. Treatment frequency of 3X/week seems preferred over 2X/week and was as effective. A large double-blind RCT is feasible and necessary to test specific NF effectiveness.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI