哌醋甲酯
致盲
医学
不利影响
安慰剂
注意缺陷多动障碍
精神科
阿托莫西汀
荟萃分析
儿科
临床心理学
随机对照试验
临床试验
兴奋剂
相对风险
梅德林
作者
Ole Jakob Storebø,Maja Rosenberg Overby Storm,Johanne Pereira Ribeiro,Maria Skoog,Camilla Groth,Henriette Edemann-Callesen,Julie Perrine Schaug,Pernille Darling,Christel-Mie Lykke Huus,Morris Zwi,Richard Kirubakaran,Erik Simonsen,Christian Gluud
标识
DOI:10.1002/14651858.cd009885.pub4
摘要
The majority of our conclusions from the 2015 version of this review still apply. Our updated meta-analyses suggest that methylphenidate versus placebo or no-intervention may improve teacher-rated ADHD symptoms and general behaviour in children and adolescents with ADHD. There may be no effects on serious adverse events and quality of life. Methylphenidate may be associated with an increased risk of adverse events considered non-serious, such as sleep problems and decreased appetite. However, the certainty of the evidence for all outcomes is very low and therefore the true magnitude of effects remain unclear. Due to the frequency of non-serious adverse events associated with methylphenidate, the blinding of participants and outcome assessors is particularly challenging. To accommodate this challenge, an active placebo should be sought and utilised. It may be difficult to find such a drug, but identifying a substance that could mimic the easily recognised adverse effects of methylphenidate would avert the unblinding that detrimentally affects current randomised trials. Future systematic reviews should investigate the subgroups of patients with ADHD that may benefit most and least from methylphenidate. This could be done with individual participant data to investigate predictors and modifiers like age, comorbidity, and ADHD subtypes.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI