医学
3d打印
开颅术
医疗保健
课程
医疗保健系统
虚拟现实
医学教育
人机交互
生物医学工程
外科
心理学
教育学
计算机科学
经济
经济增长
作者
Barbara A. Hoglund,Arnau Benet-Cabero,Francisco Rivera,Cyrus Elahi,Dakota Graham,Danielle VanBrabant,Michael T. Lawton
出处
期刊:Neurosurgery
[Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
日期:2025-03-14
卷期号:71 (Supplement_1): 259-259
标识
DOI:10.1227/neu.0000000000003360_2057
摘要
INTRODUCTION: Often benefiting last from medical innovations, low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) represent fertile ground for the development of neurosurgical simulation models using virtual reality (VR) and 3D printing. This is because the use of cadavers, the current “gold standard” of neurosurgical simulation, is limited in LMICs due to financial, cultural, and/or legal constraints. METHODS: The curriculum was piloted by 40 neurosurgical residents and young attendings in a LMIC. 20 participants trained using a VR model and subsequently performed a craniotomy on a 3D printed model. The remaining 20 participants performed a craniotomy on the 3D printed model immediately without prior VR training. Performance metrics collected for both groups during the simulation with the physical model included the need for craniotomy size correction, correct osteotomy order, time needed to complete the craniotomy, and correct craniometric landmark use. Participants also completed a questionnaire assessing curriculum fidelity and prior experience with surgical simulation training and VR. RESULTS: 70% of VR-trained participants performed a craniotomy that did not require size correction, compared to 20% of the remaining participants (p<0.01). VR-trained participants more frequently performed the osteotomies in the correct order (VR=90%, no VR=30%) (p<0.01). 85% of VR-trained participants finished the craniotomy by the end of the session, compared 40% of the remaining participants (p<0.01). 95% of VR-trained participants used craniometric landmarks during the physical surgical simulation, compared to 55% of their counterparts (p<0.01). 95% of participants felt the model had enough anatomical fidelity for neurosurgical training. CONCLUSIONS: The curriculum developed by the authors represents a viable, cost-effective alternative to cadaveric neurosurgical training that may improve access to surgical simulation in LMICs.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI