医学
前列腺癌
模式
放射治疗
雄激素剥夺疗法
医学物理学
比较有效性研究
治疗方式
模态(人机交互)
重症监护医学
癌症
肿瘤科
内科学
替代医学
病理
计算机科学
社会学
人机交互
社会科学
作者
Xinglei Shen,Nicholas G. Zaorsky,Mark V. Mishra,Kathleen A. Foley,Terry Hyslop,Sarah Hegarty,Laura T. Pizzi,Adam P. Dicker,Timothy N. Showalter
出处
期刊:Future Oncology
[Future Medicine]
日期:2011-12-13
卷期号:8 (1): 37-54
被引量:11
摘要
Comparative effectiveness research aims to help clinicians, patients and policymakers make informed treatment decisions under real-world conditions. Prostate cancer patients have multiple treatment options, including active surveillance, androgen deprivation therapy, surgery and multiple modalities of radiation therapy. Technological innovations in radiation therapy for prostate cancer have been rapidly adopted into clinical practice despite relatively limited evidence for effectiveness showing the benefit for one modality over another. Comparative effectiveness research has become an essential component of prostate cancer research to help define the benefits, risks and effectiveness of the different radiation therapy modalities currently in use for prostate cancer treatment.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI