A scoring system for appraising mixed methods research, and concomitantly appraising qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods primary studies in Mixed Studies Reviews

定性研究 主题分析 多元方法论 批判性评价 质量(理念) 定性性质 系统回顾 管理科学 梅德林 定性分析 心理学 计算机科学 医学 替代医学 病理 社会学 工程类 数学教育 哲学 法学 机器学习 认识论 社会科学 政治学
作者
Pierre Pluye,Marie‐Pierre Gagnon,Frances Griffiths,Janique Johnson‐Lafleur
出处
期刊:International Journal of Nursing Studies [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:46 (4): 529-546 被引量:821
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.01.009
摘要

A new form of literature review has emerged, Mixed Studies Review (MSR). These reviews include qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods studies. In the present paper, we examine MSRs in health sciences, and provide guidance on processes that should be included and reported. However, there are no valid and usable criteria for concomitantly appraising the methodological quality of the qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods studies.To propose criteria for concomitantly appraising the methodological quality of qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods studies or study components.A three-step critical review was conducted.2322 references were identified in MEDLINE, and their titles and abstracts were screened; 149 potentially relevant references were selected and the full-text papers were examined; 59 MSRs were retained and scrutinized using a deductive-inductive qualitative thematic data analysis. This revealed three types of MSR: convenience, reproducible, and systematic.Guided by a proposal, we conducted a qualitative thematic data analysis of the quality appraisal procedures used in the 17 systematic MSRs (SMSRs).Of 17 SMSRs, 12 showed clear quality appraisal procedures with explicit criteria but no SMSR used valid checklists to concomitantly appraise qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods studies. In two SMSRs, criteria were developed following a specific procedure. Checklists usually contained more criteria than needed. In four SMSRs, a reliability assessment was described or mentioned. While criteria for quality appraisal were usually based on descriptors that require specific methodological expertise (e.g., appropriateness), no SMSR described the fit between reviewers' expertise and appraised studies. Quality appraisal usually resulted in studies being ranked by methodological quality.A scoring system is proposed for concomitantly appraising the methodological quality of qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods studies for SMSRs. This scoring system may also be used to appraise the methodological quality of qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods components of mixed methods research.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
情怀应助GYY采纳,获得10
刚刚
orixero应助shen采纳,获得10
1秒前
1秒前
3秒前
4秒前
Ly发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
cuijingjinger完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
小橘子发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
7秒前
FashionBoy应助谨慎蓝天采纳,获得10
8秒前
科研通AI2S应助风趣的绿茶采纳,获得10
8秒前
刘小谁完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
长情天川发布了新的文献求助20
10秒前
Hello应助AidenZhang采纳,获得10
11秒前
我是老大应助jash采纳,获得10
13秒前
14秒前
Alex发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
14秒前
打打应助陆汲采纳,获得10
14秒前
打打应助随机来的名字采纳,获得10
15秒前
16秒前
16秒前
晴晴晴完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
gmjinfeng完成签到,获得积分0
18秒前
shen发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
无花果应助Alex采纳,获得10
19秒前
小路发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
滴答滴答滴完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
科研通AI2S应助xxx采纳,获得10
21秒前
21秒前
小马甲应助小路采纳,获得10
26秒前
26秒前
27秒前
27秒前
汉堡包应助xiaoxiao采纳,获得30
29秒前
乐乐应助xiaoxiao采纳,获得10
29秒前
Ly完成签到,获得积分10
30秒前
搜集达人应助Cloud9采纳,获得10
30秒前
Akong完成签到,获得积分10
31秒前
yxy840325发布了新的文献求助10
31秒前
高分求助中
Invited Discussant 63O and 64O 1000
Ideology and Meaning-Making under the Putin Regime 750
Petrology and Plate Tectonics 500
A Handbook of User Experience Research & Design in Libraries 400
Understanding Modeling and Simulation of Polymerization Reactions 400
Direct and Iterative Linear System Solvers 400
《KNN基无铅压电陶瓷电学性能优化与物理机理研究》 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 计算机科学 化学工程 生物化学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 光电子学 物理化学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 遗传学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6905417
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8599070
关于积分的说明 18254058
捐赠科研通 6309092
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3063981
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2086817
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2041775