异丙酚
医学
麻醉
恶心
镇静
不利影响
呕吐
入射(几何)
镇静剂
内科学
物理
光学
作者
Ai Wei,Shijin Ma,Yuzhe Dou,Xiaojun Wang,Jianxiong Wu,Shuzhi Zhou,Yanfang Deng,Xin-Quan Liu,Dongming Li,Mengchang Yang
出处
期刊:PLOS ONE
[Public Library of Science]
日期:2023-08-03
卷期号:18 (8): e0282930-e0282930
被引量:19
标识
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0282930
摘要
Introduction Hypotension is the most common adverse event under propofol-mediated sedation and is possible to cause varying degrees of damage to patients. Whereas remimazolam has a poorer sedative effect than propofol. Aim The aim of this study was to explore the advantages of the combination of remimazolam tosylate and propofol. Methods 304 patients were divided into the remimazolam tosylate group (RT group), the propofol group (P group), and the remimazolam tosylate plus propofol group(R+T group). The primary outcome was the incidence of hypotension. Secondary outcomes included the results of sedation and recovery. The safety results mainly include the incidence of Hypotension, adverse respiratory events, postoperative nausea and vomiting, hiccup, cough, body movement and bradycardia. Results The incidence of hypotension was 56.7% in the P group, 12.6% in the RT group, and 31.3% in the R+P group, three groups of pairwise comparisons showed statistical differences, with P < 0.001. The incidence of body movement was significantly higher in the RT group (26.1%) than in the P group (10.3%) and the R+P group (12.5%), P = 0.004. The endoscopist satisfaction was higher in the P (3.87±0.44) and R+P (3.95±0.22)groups than in the RT(3.53±0.84) group. The incidence of adverse events, in descending order, was P group, RT group, and R+P group (93.8%vs.61.3%vs.42.7%). Conclusion Co-administration had fewer adverse events than propofol monotherapy, also had a better sedative effect and higher endoscopist satisfaction than remimazolam monotherapy. Trial registration Clinical trial registration number: NCT05429086 .
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI