医学
粘膜切除术
置信区间
活检
外科
结直肠外科
切除术
随机对照试验
放射科
腹部外科
内科学
作者
Douglas K. Rex,Joseph C. Anderson,Heiko Pohl,Rachel E. Lahr,Stephanie Judd,Fadi Antaki,Kirthi Lilley,Peter Castelluccio,Krishna C. Vemulapalli
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2022.03.006
摘要
Cold snare resection of colorectal lesions has been found to be safe and effective for an expanding set of colorectal lesions. In this study, we sought to understand the efficacy of simple cold snare resection and cold EMR versus hot snare resection and hot EMR for colorectal lesions 6 to 15 mm in size.At 3 U.S. centers, 235 patients with 286 colorectal lesions 6 to 15 mm in size were randomized to cold snaring, cold EMR, hot snaring, or hot EMR for nonpedunculated colorectal lesions 6 to 15 mm in size. The primary outcome was complete resection determined by 4 biopsy samples from the defect margin and 1 biopsy sample from the center of the resection defect.The overall incomplete resection rate was 2.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], .8%-7.5%). All 7 incompletely removed polyps were 10 to 15 mm in size and removed by hot EMR (n = 4, 6.2%), hot snare (n = 2, 2.2%), or cold EMR (n = 1, 1.8%). Cold snaring had no incomplete resections, required less procedural time than the other methods, and was not associated with serious adverse events.Cold snaring is a dominant resection technique for nonpedunculated colorectal lesions 6 to 15 mm in size. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT03462706.).
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI