产业组织                        
                
                                
                        
                            多样性(控制论)                        
                
                                
                        
                            业务                        
                
                                
                        
                            落后                        
                
                                
                        
                            技术变革                        
                
                                
                        
                            随意的                        
                
                                
                        
                            中国                        
                
                                
                        
                            政府(语言学)                        
                
                                
                        
                            质量(理念)                        
                
                                
                        
                            经济                        
                
                                
                        
                            经济增长                        
                
                                
                        
                            宏观经济学                        
                
                                
                        
                            复合材料                        
                
                                
                        
                            法学                        
                
                                
                        
                            人工智能                        
                
                                
                        
                            哲学                        
                
                                
                        
                            认识论                        
                
                                
                        
                            材料科学                        
                
                                
                        
                            语言学                        
                
                                
                        
                            计算机科学                        
                
                                
                        
                            政治学                        
                
                        
                    
            作者
            
                Zhan-ao Wang,Chengsi Zheng            
         
                    
        
    
            
            标识
            
                                    DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.04.005
                                    
                                
                                 
         
        
                
            摘要
            
            • Find the divergence between the developed and developing countries towards excess capacity. • Prove a roadmap from technological innovation to overcapacity, and their influencing mechanism. • Provide suggestions for overcapacity regulation in such developing countries as China. • Enrich technological innovation research by testing its economic consequences. • Test a variety of enterprise heterogeneities and additionally test the overcapacity subgroup. Enterprises were shown to increase excess capacity more cost-effectively owing to technological improvements in the United States. However, technological backwardness is considered a cause for overcapacity in China. This divergence inspires deep investigation into the holistic roadmap from technological innovation to overcapacity. This study theoretically extends the endogenous growth model, constructs mediating and moderating effect models, and empirically tests publicly listed firms in China. It proves that technological innovation curbs overcapacity through enhancing enterprise competitiveness and reducing overinvestment. A variety of enterprise heterogeneities moderate the casual relationship. Moreover, for firms with a relatively high level of technological innovation, the negative impact of overinvestment on capacity utilization (CU) diminishes. Instead of implementing one-size-fits-all approaches, more attempts by the Chinese government on stimulating enterprises’ innovation initiatives are necessary when modifying de-capacity policies. The market should be developed to better distinguish innovation quality and avoid overinvestment from the onset.
         
            
 
                 
                
                    
                    科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI