冲刺
Plyometrics公司
蹲下
等长运动
跳跃的
力量训练
物理疗法
拉伸缩短周期
考试(生物学)
模式
培训(气象学)
数学
物理医学与康复
跳跃
医学
生理学
古生物学
社会科学
物理
量子力学
社会学
气象学
生物
作者
Greg J. Wilson,Robert U. Newton,Aron J. Murphy,Brendan Humphries
标识
DOI:10.1249/00005768-199311000-00013
摘要
This study was performed to determine which of three theoretically optimal resistance training modalities resulted in the greatest enhancement in the performance of a series of dynamic athletic activities. The three training modalities included 1) traditional weight training, 2) plyometric training, and 3) explosive weight training at the load that maximized mechanical power output. Sixty-four previously trained subjects were randomly allocated to four groups that included the above three training modalities and a control group. The experimental groups trained for 10 wk performing either heavy squat lifts, depth jumps, or weighted squat jumps. All subjects were tested prior to training, after 5 wk of training and at the completion of the training period. The test items included 1) 30-m sprint, 2) vertical jumps performed with and without a countermovement, 3) maximal cycle test, 4) isokinetic leg extension test, and 5) a maximal isometric test. The experimental group which trained with the load that maximized mechanical power achieved the best overall results in enhancing dynamic athletic performance recording statistically significant (P < 0.05) improvements on most test items and producing statistically superior results to the two other training modalities on the jumping and isokinetic tests.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI